SILICA-CARBONATE ISOTOPIC TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION

SILICA-CARBONATE ISOTOPIC TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION
复制标题

DOI:
10.1126/science.258.5085.1162
复制
发表时间:
1992-11-13
期刊:
影响因子:
56.9
通讯作者:
CLAYTON, RN
CLAYTON, RN
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
CLAYTON, RN

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

............. 0-M.. M; ON. W4 V. - I Nol,”W”W“',....不确定度为± 40 ℃。对于大多数海洋学和气候学目的来说,如此大的不确定性是不可接受的。Shemesh等人推导出了硅-碳酸盐同位素温度校准,温度系数为-0.26/mil/℃,相应的古温度不确定性仅为-0.26/mil/℃。60度。这是如何实现的?从A. Julillet-Leclerc和L. Labey-rie(7),Shemesh等人从18个数据点中选择了6个,这些数据点覆盖了温度范围的一小部分,并提取了与其他数据不兼容的二氧化硅-水温度系数。因此,他们的结论似乎是无效的。Robert N.克莱顿恩里科费米研究所,芝加哥大学,
............. 0-M.. M; ON... W4 V.-I Nol," W" W"',.......... uncertainty is±40C. For most oceano-graphic and climatological purposes, such a large uncertainty would be unacceptable. Shemesh et al. derived a silica-carbonate isotopic temperature calibration with a temperature coefficient of-0.26 per mil per degrees Celsius, with a corresponding paleotemperature uncertainty of only-+ 0.. 60C. How was this accomplished? From the data of A. Juillet-Leclerc and L. Labey-rie (7), Shemesh et al. selected 6 of the 18 data points spanning a small fraction of the temperature range and extracted a silica-water temperature coefficient that is incom-patible with other data. Thus their conclu-sions appear to be invalidated. Robert N. Clayton Enrico Fermii Institute, Unive~ rsity of Chicago,