Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time?
Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.728
复制
发表时间：
2003-08-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Stuart, GL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Holtzworth-Munroe, A;Meehan, JC;Stuart, GL
在以前的殴打者类型学研究中，只有一项研究收集了纵向数据，没有研究检查亚型是否随着时间的推移而继续彼此不同。本研究就是这样做的。我们预测，在1.5年和3年的随访中，在时间1（A。霍尔茨-芒罗Meehan，K. Herron，U. Escherman，G. L.斯图尔特，2000年;只有家庭，低水平的反社会，边缘/烦躁，一般暴力/反社会）将继续在丈夫暴力水平和其他相关变量（例如，暴力的普遍性、精神病理学、嫉妒、冲动、对暴力和妇女的态度）。虽然许多组间差异出现在预测的方向，但并不是所有的都达到统计学意义，可能是因为样本量小。调查结果的影响（例如，并不是所有的婚姻暴力都会升级;边缘/烦躁和一般暴力/反社会亚组的可能重叠）被讨论，方法问题也被讨论（例如，随着时间的推移，需要更多的评估，暴力关系的不稳定性）。
In previous batterer typology studies, only 1 study gathered longitudinal data and no research examined whether subtypes continue to differ from one another over time. The present study did so. We predicted that, at 1.5- and 3-year follow-ups, the subtypes identified at Time 1 (A. Holtzworth-Munroe, J. C. Meehan, K. Herron, U. Rehman, G. L. Stuart, 2000; family only, low level antisocial, borderline/ dysphoric, and generally violent/antisocial) would continue to differ in level of husband violence and on other relevant variables (e.g., generality of violence, psychopathology, jealousy, impulsivity, attitudes toward violence and women). Although many group differences emerged in the predicted direction, not all reached statistical significance, perhaps because of small sample sizes. Implications of the findings (e.g., not all marital violence escalates; possible overlap of the borderline/dysphoric and generally violent/antisocial subgroups) are discussed, as are methodological issues (e.g., need for more assessments over time, the instability of violent relationships).