Rational Versus Communicative: Towards an Understanding of Spatial Planning Methods in German Planning Practice
Rational Versus Communicative: Towards an Understanding of Spatial Planning Methods in German Planning Practice
复制标题
理性与沟通:理解德国规划实践中的空间规划方法
DOI:
10.1080/02697459.2018.1430410
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Oberding
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Diller;Christian;Hoffmann;Oberding
This paper considers the use of planning methods in German planning practice against the background of the ‘communicative turn’. The debate about concepts of rationality in Germany as well as in other countries can be said to have resulted in the paradigm of communicative actor-oriented planning achieving at least the same standing as the analytical rationality of the classical expert-based planning model. The inconsistent use of the term method in research corresponds to empirical findings indicating that the term is used ambiguously in practice. Nonetheless, planning methods fulfil a number of functions in practice. The notion of a relatively clear division between ‘analytical-rational’ methods on the one hand and ‘communicative’ methods on the other hand was relativized by experimental investigations. The setting in which the methods are applied seems of more importance; even apparently ‘analytical-rational’ planning methods can be implemented in a more or less communicative fashion.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Walter Schönwandt
通讯作者:
Walter Schönwandt
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
C. Diller
通讯作者:
C. Diller
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Peter Koschitz;H. Arras
通讯作者:
H. Arras
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1980
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Meise;Andreas Volwahsen
通讯作者:
Andreas Volwahsen
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
D. Fürst;F. Scholles
通讯作者:
F. Scholles