Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish
Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish
复制标题
DOI：
10.1515/tlr-2014-0022
复制
发表时间：
2015-05-01
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
Marin, Rafael
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fabregas, Antonio;Marin, Rafael
体概念虽然在动词中表现得最清楚，但也表现在各个范畴中，像（无）界性这样的概念表现在几个实例中，这些实例有时是个别语法范畴所特有的。本文通过对主体-经验者心理谓词和客体-经验者心理谓词的分析，对目前关于体概念如何在不同范畴中出现的争论做出了贡献。我们审查的证据表明，SEPVs表示个人水平（IL）的国家，并提供新的事实-从分词的行为-有利于诊断，我们还认为，OEPVs应被归类为阶段水平（SL）类的国家。我们认为，OEPVs表示状态的发病，这对应于SL的外延。SEPV只是表示没有边界的状态，我们认为这对应于IL谓词。最后，我们展示了这两个指称如何遵循，而不需要进一步假设以前的工作，特别是Pesetsky（1995）中为SEPVs和OEPVs提出的结构，使得没有必要假设这种区别是词汇性质的。
Aspectual notions, although displayed most clearly in verbs, manifest across categories, with notions like (un)boundedness manifesting themselves in several instantiations which are sometimes specific of individual grammatical categories. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on how aspectual notions emerge in different categorial domains by an analysis of subject-experiencer and object-experiencer psychological predicates (SEPVs and OEPVs, respectively). We review the evidence that SEPVs denote individual level (IL) states, and provide new facts - taken from the behaviour of participles - in favour of that diagnostic; we also argue that OEPVs should be classified as states of the stage level (SL) class. We argue that OEPVs denote states with an onset, which corresponds to the denotation of SLs. SEPVs simply denote states without boundaries, which we argue to correspond to IL predicates. Finally, we show how these two denotations follow without further assumptions from the structures proposed for SEPVs and OEPVs in previous work, specially Pesetsky (1995), making it unnecessary to postulate that the distinction is of lexical nature.