Personal Perceptions and Perceived Public Opinion About Stuttering in the United States: Implications for Anti-Stigma Campaigns

Personal Perceptions and Perceived Public Opinion About Stuttering in the United States: Implications for Anti-Stigma Campaigns
复制标题

DOI:
10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0191
复制
发表时间:
2017-08-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Boyle, Michael P.
Boyle, Michael P.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Boyle, Michael P.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:这项探索性研究是第一个获得定量和定性数据的个人看法和感知的公众舆论对口吃,以确定主题,包括在反污名计划口吃。方法:在美国,310名成年人完成了一项网络调查,该调查评估了对口吃的了解以及对口吃者的态度(PWS),问题涉及个人看法(直接问题)和感知的公众舆论(间接问题)。结果:许多参与者报告了有利的个人看法PWS对他们的智力,能力和成功的潜力。然而,大多数参与者并不认为PWS自信,大多数人认为他们害羞。大多数人认为,公众与PWS交谈会感到不舒服,公众会建议PWS避免从事需要高演讲要求的工作,避免与大量观众交谈。少数参与者同意PWS被认为是公开的能力或心理health.Conclusions:调查表明PWS的误解和负面看法,特别是当测量与感知的公众舆论。结果可以增加我们的理解内容领域,应包括在反污名计划口吃和突出不同的方法来分析公众对口吃的看法。
Purpose: This exploratory study was the first to obtain quantitative and qualitative data on both personal perceptions and perceived public opinion about stuttering in order to identify topics to include in anti-stigma programs for stuttering.Method: Three-hundred ten adults in the United States completed a web survey that assessed knowledge about stuttering and attitudes toward people who stutter (PWS) with questions addressing personal perceptions (direct questions) and perceived public opinion (indirect questions).Results: Many participants reported favorable personal perceptions of PWS regarding their intelligence, competence, and potential for success. However, most participants did not personally believe PWS were confident, and most believed they were shy. Perceived public opinion was more unfavorable as a majority agreed that the public is uncomfortable talking with PWS and that the public would recommend PWS avoid jobs requiring high speech demands and avoid talking to large audiences. A minority of participants agreed PWS are perceived publicly as capable or mentally healthy.Conclusions: The survey demonstrated misunderstandings and negative perceptions of PWS, especially when measured with perceived public opinion. Results can increase our understanding of content areas that should be included in anti-stigma programs for stuttering and highlight different methods for analyzing public perceptions of stuttering.