The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings
The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings
复制标题
将政治作为战略和游戏的框架：概念、操作和主要发现的回顾
DOI：
10.1177/1464884911427799
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Claes H. de Vreese
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Aalberg;J. Strömbäck;Claes H. de Vreese
媒体政治报道研究中的一个关键概念是博弈或战略框架。与将政治作为问题进行报道不同，将政治框定为一种战略游戏的特点是，输赢是核心关注点，关注候选人或政党在民意调查中的表现。然而，这种框架的普遍性是有争议的，因为(1)框架被概念化和可操作性的方式有很大的不同；(2)尽管一些人使用诸如游戏框架和策略框架等术语作为同义词，但另一些人认为它们之间存在概念上的差异。在此背景下，本文回顾了关于媒体将政治框定为一种战略游戏的研究，使用了什么概念，以及它们是如何被操作的，并提出了在媒体使用战略和/或博弈框架的研究中提高概念清晰度和可比性的综合和方法。
A key concept in research on the media coverage of politics is the game or strategy frame. Contrasted with coverage of politics as issues, the framing of politics as a strategic game is marked by features such as winning and losing as the central concern and a focus on how candidates or parties are doing in opinion polls. The pervasiveness of such framing is, however, disputed since (1) the way in which the frames are conceptualized and operationalized differs significantly; and (2) while some use terms such as ‘game frame’ and ‘strategy frame’ as synonymous, others argue that there is a conceptual difference between them. Against this background, this article reviews research on the media’s framing of politics as a strategic game, what concepts have been used, and how they have been operationalized; and suggests a synthesis and ways of improving conceptual clarity and comparability in research on the media’s use of strategy and/or game frames.