Evaluation Probes

Evaluation Probes
复制标题

DOI:
10.1145/2702123.2702466
复制
发表时间:
2015-04
期刊:
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Anna Luusua;Johanna Ylipulli;Marko Jurmu;Henrika Pihlajaniemi;Piia Markkanen;Timo Ojala
Anna Luusua;Johanna Ylipulli;Marko Jurmu;Henrika Pihlajaniemi;Piia Markkanen;Timo Ojala
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Anna Luusua;Johanna Ylipulli;Marko Jurmu;Henrika Pihlajaniemi;Piia Markkanen;Timo Ojala

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们引入了评估探针,用于在没有研究人员直接参与的情况下对“野外”城市技术进行总体、体验式评估。我们首先对加弗、邓恩和帕森蒂用来获取设计灵感的原始文化探索及其后续变化进行了彻底的讨论和分析。我们通过在野外进行的三项连续研究中仔细地重新概念化和应用文化探针,开发了评估探针的概念。我们回顾并反思了评估探针的使用,并讨论了它们在经验性流行病评估中的优点和局限性。
We introduce evaluation probes for conducting emic, experiential evaluation of urban technologies "in the wild" without direct researcher presence. We commence with a thorough discussion and analysis of the original cultural probes, used by Gaver, Dunne and Pacenti to gain design inspiration, and their subsequent variations. We develop the concept of evaluation probes through careful re-conceptualization and application of the cultural probes in three successive studies conducted in the wild. We recount and reflect on our use of evaluation probes and discuss their merits and limitations in experiential emic evaluation.