Searching for Transitologists: Contemporary Theories of Post-Communist Transitions and the Myth of a Dominant Paradigm
Searching for Transitologists: Contemporary Theories of Post-Communist Transitions and the Myth of a Dominant Paradigm
复制标题
寻找过渡学家：后共产主义过渡的当代理论和主导范式的神话
DOI：
10.2747/1060-586x.20.4.320
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
J. Gans
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Gans
一位政治学家调查了这样一种说法，即后共产主义研究领域现在和过去都被一种过渡论范式所主导，这种范式的目的论偏见导致了错误的分析。基于对1991年至2003年期间发表在10个领先领域研究和比较政治期刊上的后共产主义政权更迭研究的全面分析，以及对后共产主义过渡文献的更广泛审查，本文试图澄清术语上的混乱，这是过境学批评的一个突出特点，并审查一个单一的分析模式主导了过境学研究的说法。后共产主义
A political scientist investigates the claim that the field of post-communist studies is and has been dominated by a transitology paradigm whose teleological biases lead to faulty analysis. Based on a comprehensive analysis of post-communist regime change studies published in 10 leading area studies and comparative politics journals between 1991 and 2003 as well as a broader review of the post-communist transition literature, this article seeks to clarify the terminological confusion that is a prominent feature of critiques of transitology and to examine the claim that a single mode of analysis dominates the study of post-communism.