Chronic pouchitis versus recurrent Crohn's disease: a diagnostic challenge.
Chronic pouchitis versus recurrent Crohn's disease: a diagnostic challenge.
复制标题
慢性储袋炎与复发性克罗恩病:诊断挑战。
DOI:
10.1007/s10620-013-2816-5
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Rubin,DavidT
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Weber,ChristopherR;Rubin,DavidT
Up to one-third of patients with ulcerative colitis will require total abdominal colectomy due to being refractory to therapy or the development of mucosal dysplasia or carcinoma. In these patients, the restorative procedure of choice is ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), in which the distal ileum is formed into a pouch and anastomosed to the anus. Such a pouch creates a reservoir, which, when functioning properly, will minimize the frequency of bowel movements in the absence of a colon. One frequent complication of IPAA, however, is the development of pouch inflammation, known as pouchitis, which occurs in 15% of patients in the first post-operative year [6]. The majority of patients with pouchitis are successfully managed with antibiotics, though a portion experience multiple recurrent episodes. Some patients develop inflammation proximal to the pouch or even develop penetrating transmural complications suggesting a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Occasionally, patients experience multiple episodes of chronic pouch inflammation due to recurrent Crohn’s disease. Although this was previously believed to be due to an initial misdiagnosis of the underlying cause of colitis, more recently, this ‘‘transformation’’is thought to be due to changing environmental pressure given the altered postsurgical anatomy. Clinically it is important to identify patients with a modification in diagnosis early in order to provide appropriate Crohn’s disease therapy in an effort to prevent pouch failure and to eliminate reversion to traditional enterocutaneous ileostomies. In order to differentiate between chronic antibiotic-resistant pouchitis, prepouch ileitis, and Crohn’s disease, endoscopic examination and biopsies are usually performed. The most important factor to consider is the distribution pattern of inflammation. If the pouch displays features of chronic but nonpenetrating injury, and the pre-pouch ileum and the remainder of the GI tract appear normal, the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease is unlikely. Nevertheless, the diagnosis is not always straightforward if the distribution of disease is somewhat patchy, or if there is equivocal evidence of chronic injury in mucosa proximal to the pouch. Under such circumstances, additional diagnostic markers would prove to be quite useful.One possible histological marker useful in differentiating between Crohn’s disease and chronic pouchitis is pyloric gland metaplasia (PGM)[5]. PGM occurs when intestinal-type epithelium, which is normally present in the ileal pouch, is replaced by glands that resemble gastric pyloric glands (Fig. 1 b). These metaplastic pyloric glands are easily identified by routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining as tall columnar cells with pale pink cytoplasm and small dark basally situated nuclei (Fig. 1 a, inset). As the glands develop, they normally grow into a clustered architecture at the mucosal base. PGM may be observed in a number of intestinal disorders associated with repetitive ulcerations and regeneration [4]. PGM is present in the majority of ileal biopsies from patients with Crohn’s disease [3], however, since PGM arises in response to recurrent ulceration, it has been considered a non-specific marker. Other causes of PGM include tumors, radiation enteritis, peptic ulceration, tuberculosis, and Yersinia enterocolitis [4]. Nonetheless, these disease manifestations are not typically observed in an ileoanal pouch, and can usually be excluded on clinical grounds [3].