Takeaways from the Special Issue on The Practice of Replication

Takeaways from the Special Issue on The Practice of Replication
复制标题

复制实践特刊的要点

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
W. Robert Reed
W. Robert Reed
中科院分区:
经济学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Robert Reed

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要2017年7月,《经济学:开放获取、开放评估电子期刊》(Economics:The Open Access,Open Assessment E-Journal)发布了一篇关于“复制实践”的特刊的论文征集。在那次电话会议上,《华尔街日报》解释说,对于如何进行复制,没有普遍接受的程序。同样,也没有一个普遍接受的标准来确定一个复制是否“证实或否定”一个原始的研究。因此,该杂志要求论文确定如何进行复制以及如何解释其结果的原则;并将这些原则应用于为作者选择的研究制定复制计划。希望这项工作将在“推广做法”方面取得一些进展。该特刊现已完成,共有8篇期刊文章。本评注将各条款置于一个共同框架内,并确定了从各研究报告中得出的意见和经验教训。
Abstract In July 2017, Economics: The Open Access, Open Assessment E-Journal issued a call for papers for a special issue on “The Practice of Replication.” In that call, the journal explained that there was no generally accepted procedure for how to do a replication. Likewise, there was no generally accepted standard for determining whether a replication “confirms or disconfirms” an original study. Accordingly, the journal called for papers to identify principles for how to do a replication and how to interpret its results; and to apply those principles in crafting a replication plan for a study of the author’s choosing. The hope was that this exercise would produce some progress on “the practice of replication.” The special issue is now complete with a total of eight journal articles. This commentary places the respective articles within a common framework and identifies observations and lessons learned from the respective studies.