Theoretical and experimental investigations of the performance of keyword auction mechanisms

Theoretical and experimental investigations of the performance of keyword auction mechanisms
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/1756-2171.12026
复制
发表时间:
2013-09
期刊:
The RAND Journal of Economics
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Emiko Fukuda;Yoshio Kamijo;Ai Takeuchi;M. Masui;Yukihiko Funaki
Emiko Fukuda;Yoshio Kamijo;Ai Takeuchi;M. Masui;Yukihiko Funaki
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Emiko Fukuda;Yoshio Kamijo;Ai Takeuchi;M. Masui;Yukihiko Funaki

文献摘要

相似文献

对广义第二价格拍卖(GSP)和Vickrey-Clarke-Groves机制(VCG)这两种关键词拍卖机制进行了理论和实验比较。前者在实践中应用广泛;后者并非如此,但它具有主导战略均衡,所有参与者都出价自己的真实价值。在理论研究中,通过将“局部无嫉妒纳什均衡”应用到VCG中,我们发现两种机制下的分配是有效的,并且拍卖商收益的上界和下界是重合的。两种机制的收入和效率相似的实验室实验支持了这一结果
Two keyword auction mechanisms, the Generalized Second-Price auction (GSP) and the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism (VCG), were compared theoretically and experimentally. The former is widely used in practice; the latter is not, but it has a dominant strategy equilibrium where all participants bid their true values. In the theoretical investigation, by applying the �locally envy-free Nash equilibrium� to the VCG, we found that the allocations are efficient and that upper and lower bounds of the auctioneer's revenue coincide in the two mechanisms. A laboratory experiment, in which the revenues and efficiencies were similar in both mechanisms, supported this result