Airway Dysfunction in Obesity: Response to Voluntary Restoration of End Expiratory Lung Volume

Airway Dysfunction in Obesity: Response to Voluntary Restoration of End Expiratory Lung Volume
复制标题

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0088015
复制
发表时间:
2014-02-04
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Goldring, Roberta M.
Goldring, Roberta M.
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oppenheimer, Beno W.;Berger, Kenneth I.;Goldring, Roberta M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

简介:由于静息肺容量减少,肥胖患者可能发生远端肺功能异常;然而,也可能存在气道炎症、血管充血和/或伴随的内源性气道疾病。本研究的目的是1)利用肺量测定法、体积描记法和呼吸描记法描述肥胖受试者的肺功能表型;和2)评估当通过呼气末肺容积(EELV)的自主升高至预测FRC来消除质量负荷的影响时的残余异常。100名无心肺疾病且肺功能正常的非吸烟肥胖受试者接受了脉冲多普勒(IOS)检查结果:FRC和ERV降低(44 +/- 22,62 +/- 14%预测值),RV/TLC正常(29 +/- 9%)。IOS在20 Hz下显示电阻升高(R-20,4.65 +/- 1.07 cmH(2)O/L/s);然而,电导率正常(0.14 +/- 0.04)。5-20 Hz时的电阻(R5-20,1.86 +/- 1.11 cmH(2)O/L/s)和5 Hz时的电抗(X-5,-22.70 +/- 1.44 cmH(2)O/L/s)异常。EELV升高时,IOS异常恢复正常或接近正常。尽管EELV升高(1.16 +/- 0.8 cmH(2)O/L/s),但在一些受试者中观察到R5-20的残留异常。R5-20在基线时对支气管扩张剂有反应,但在EELV升高期间无反应。结论:本研究描述了肥胖患者肺功能障碍的表型,即FRC减少伴气道狭窄、远端呼吸功能障碍和支气管扩张剂反应性。当R5-20在自主充气期间正常化时,质量负荷被认为是主要机制。相反,当R5-20中的残余异常被证实时,尽管EELV恢复到预测的FRC,除了质量负荷之外,还可以调用气道功能障碍的机制。
Introduction: Abnormality in distal lung function may occur in obesity due to reduction in resting lung volume; however, airway inflammation, vascular congestion and/or concomitant intrinsic airway disease may also be present. The goal of this study is to 1) describe the phenotype of lung function in obese subjects utilizing spirometry, plethysmography and oscillometry; and 2) evaluate residual abnormality when the effect of mass loading is removed by voluntary elevation of end expiratory lung volume (EELV) to predicted FRC.Methods: 100 non-smoking obese subjects without cardio-pulmonary disease and with normal airflow on spirometry underwent impulse oscillometry (IOS) at baseline and at the elevated EELV.Results: FRC and ERV were reduced (44 +/- 22, 62 +/- 14% predicted) with normal RV/TLC (29 +/- 9%). IOS demonstrated elevated resistance at 20 Hz (R-20, 4.65 +/- 1.07 cmH(2)O/L/s); however, specific conductance was normal (0.14 +/- 0.04). Resistance at 5-20 Hz (R5-20, 1.86 +/- 1.11 cmH(2)O/L/s) and reactance at 5 Hz (X-5, -22.70 +/- 1.44 cmH(2)O/L/s) were abnormal. During elevation of EELV, IOS abnormalities reversed to or towards normal. Residual abnormality in R5-20 was observed in some subjects despite elevation of EELV (1.16 +/- 0.8 cmH(2)O/L/s). R5-20 responded to bronchodilator at baseline but not during elevation of EELV.Conclusions: This study describes the phenotype of lung dysfunction in obesity as reduction in FRC with airway narrowing, distal respiratory dysfunction and bronchodilator responsiveness. When R5-20 normalized during voluntary inflation, mass loading was considered the predominant mechanism. In contrast, when residual abnormality in R5-20 was demonstrable despite return of EELV to predicted FRC, mechanisms for airway dysfunction in addition to mass loading could be invoked.