New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process.
New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process.
复制标题
支持自动性别代词过程的新论点。
DOI：
10.1080/02724980343000549
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Baudiffier,Vanessa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rigalleau,Francois;Caplan,David;Baudiffier,Vanessa
本文探讨了代词处理中性别信息的自动和策略性使用。实验 1 和 2 使用短句子，其中代词前面有两个潜在的先行词。结果表明，即使成年读者没有使用代词性别来战略性地加速代词解析，他们仍然对代词与其潜在所指对象之间的性别分歧敏感。这种性别敏感性在实验 3 和 4 中得到了进一步探讨。这些实验使用了较长的文本，其中当遇到代词时，只有两个潜在指称之一是高度可访问的。代词和先行词之间的性别差异导致阅读时间更长。这四个实验证实了代词和话语焦点实体之间存在非策略性性别共索引过程。
This paper examines the automatic and strategic use of gender information in pronominal processing. Experiments 1 and 2 used short sentences where a pronoun was preceded by two potential antecedents. Results showed that even when adult readers did not use pronominal gender to strategically accelerate pronominal resolution, they remained sensitive to a gender disagreement between the pronoun and its potential referents. This gender sensitivity was further explored in Experiments 3 and 4. These experiments used longer texts where only one of the two potential referents was highly accessible when the pronoun was encountered. A gender disagreement between the pronoun and this antecedent induced longer reading times. The four experiments confirm the existence of a nonstrategic gender coindexation process between a pronoun and the entity in the focus of a discourse.