How “Life-Projects” and “Live-Projects” Ensure Sustainability and Autonomy of Co-design Community Development
How “Life-Projects” and “Live-Projects” Ensure Sustainability and Autonomy of Co-design Community Development
复制标题
“生活项目”和“生活项目”如何确保协同设计社区发展的可持续性和自主性
DOI：
10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_171
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Daijiro Mizuno
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tomohide Mizuuchi;Eizo Okada;Daijiro Mizuno
在协同设计研究中，非设计师的参与程度和作用越来越大。在此范围内，从设计师和规划师的支持者到设计过程的积极参与者的“过渡”，可以从实现设计界的可持续性和自主性的角度出发，成为社区发展领域的重点。然而，存在各种实际障碍，例如缺乏项目领导，预先确定的项目时间表与复杂的社区挑战不一致，以及如何找到这一过渡所需的框架。本文考察了日本爱知县犬山市四年来的社区发展，可以认为这是实现了自主性和可持续性，重点是人，时间和物理环境因素之间的关系。结果表明，对于参与该项目的多个人来说，活动已被称为“生活项目”，参与者在其中找到生活的目的，以及一个“生活项目”，它根据情况的变化而发展，为参与者带来自主和持续的参与。在这样做的过程中，我们揭示了受日常变化影响的个人思想和对象，从而形成了本研究的重要起点。它显示了设计项目概念的局限性，该概念仍然依赖于基于预测因果律的有计划的问题解决。同时，它表明，需要更深层次的社会学和人类学分析来讨论设计过程。
The degree of involvement and roles of non-designers has grown in co-design research. Within this, the “transition” from being a supporter of designers and planners to being an active participant in the design process can be a focus for the field of community development from the perspective of achieving sustainability and autonomy in the design community. However, there are various practical barriers, such as a lack of leadership for projects, the fact that predetermined project timelines do not align with complex community challenges, and how the framework required for this transition has yet to be found in its entirety. This paper examines four years of community development in Inuyama City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan, which can be considered as having achieved autonomy and sustainability, focusing on the relationships between human, temporal, and physical environmental factors. The results show that for the multiple people involved in the project, activities have become known as “life projects,” where participants find purpose in their lives, and a “live-project” that develops in response to changes in the situation, generating autonomous and sustained involvement for participants. In so doing, we bring to light individual thoughts and objects that are subject to everyday change and thus form important starting points in this research. It displays the limitations of the design project concept, which is still dependent on planned problem-solving based on predicted causal laws. At the same time, it shows that a deeper sociological and anthropological analysis is needed to discuss the design process.