Local Variants of Mobile Sustainable Building Assessment Models: The Marketization and Constrained Mutation of BREEAM ES
Local Variants of Mobile Sustainable Building Assessment Models: The Marketization and Constrained Mutation of BREEAM ES
复制标题
移动可持续建筑评估模型的本地变体：BREEAM ES 的市场化和受限突变
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Faulconbridge
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Faulconbridge
可持续建筑评估模型的全球化现在是一个熟悉的话题，就像关于这些模型的地方敏感度的相关辩论一样。本文的贡献是实证研究市场化的方式影响突变的模型，因为他们旅行，这对当地的敏感性的影响。所谓市场化，我们指的是当模型市场出现时的影响，以及模型的采用作为组织或城市获得竞争优势的手段。本文以一个可持续建筑评估模型--建筑研究机构环境评估模型（BREEAM）及其从英国到西班牙的迁移和向BREEAM ES的转变为例，揭示了市场化约束突变的重要途径。使用Callon的想法翻译，我们表明，该模型被翻译的方式，旨在尽量减少适应当地的情况下，以最大限度地提高建筑物的可比性评估使用BREEAM ES与建筑评估使用其他变体的BREEAM模型。这表明，我们声称，市场化是一个重要的原因，BREEAM的流动性的结果是在许多以前的研究中观察到的相反，其中一个模型的名称保持不变，但其内容和实施的做法各不相同。
The globalization of sustainable building assessment models is now a familiar topic, as are related debates about the degrees of local sensitivity of such models. The contribution of this paper is to examine empirically the way marketization affects the mutation of models as they travel, and the implications of this for local sensitivity. By marketization we mean the effects when both a market for models emerges, and the adoption of a model acts as a means for an organization or city to gain competitive advantage over rivals. Using the case of one sustainable building assessment model, the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Model (BREEAM), and its movement from the UK to Spain and transformation into BREEAM ES, the paper reveals the important ways that marketization can constrain mutation. Using Callon’s ideas about translation, we show that the model was translated in a way designed to minimize adaptations to local context in order to maximise the comparability of buildings assessed using BREEAM ES with building assessed using other variants of the BREEAM model. This suggests, we claim, that marketization is a significant reason for the outcomes of the mobility of BREEAM being the opposite of that observed in many previous studies where a model’s name stays the same but its content and the practice of implementation varies.