COMPARISON BETWEEN POWER OFF-ICE TEST AND PERFORMANCE ON-ICE ANAEROBIC TESTING
COMPARISON BETWEEN POWER OFF-ICE TEST AND PERFORMANCE ON-ICE ANAEROBIC TESTING
复制标题
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0000000000002336
复制
发表时间：
2020-12-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Comtois, Alain S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Boucher, Vincent G.;Parent, Andree-Anne;Comtois, Alain S.
专项测试在冰球运动中的重要性已经得到证实，对专项测试和专项测试之间的理解和联系可能会对优秀运动员的适应性训练和后续跟进产生影响。本研究的目的是比较2个冰上力量测试与冰上表现的国家冰球联盟（NHL）球员。在冰上，我们采用垂直跳跃和跳远测试作为评价指标，而在冰上，我们采用改良的SAS-40和重复冲刺滑冰（RSSm）测试作为评价指标。来自NHL的31名球员（3名守门员，10名防守球员，18名前锋）在季前赛训练营之前进行了表演。进行四次评估，每隔48小时进行一次。结果表明：两种起跳类型之间存在显著的相关关系（r(2) = 0.45 p < 0.01），防守队员的垂直起跳与最佳SAS-40计时赛成绩之间存在显著的相关关系，而前锋队员的垂直起跳与最佳SAS-40计时赛成绩之间无显著的相关关系(r(2) = 0.76 p = 0.02；R (2) = 0.21, p = 0.16)。前锋运动员跳远与最佳SAS-40计时赛成绩显著相关，防守运动员无显著相关(r(2) = 0.75 p, 0.01；R (2) = 0.19, p = 0.28)。总之，结果表明，在选择场外测试时，需要考虑特定球员的能力。
The importance of specific testing has been shown in ice hockey performance, and the understanding and connection between them may lead to adapting training and follow-up in elite athletes. The aim of this study was to compare 2 off-ice power tests with performances on ice with National Hockey League (NHL) players. The vertical jump and broad jump tests were used for the off-ice evaluations, whereas a modified SAS-40 and a repeated-sprint skate (RSSm) test were used on-ice as performance variables. Thirty-one players (3 goalkeepers, 10 defense players, and 18 forward players) from the NHL performed before preseason training camp. Four evaluation sessions were performed with 48-hour time intervals between them. The results show that the 2 jump types were correlated (r(2) = 0.45 p < 0.01), and there was a significant correlation between the vertical jump and the best SAS-40 time trial for defense players, but not for forward players (r(2) = 0.76 p = 0.02; r(2) = 0.21 p = 0.16, respectively). By contrast, there was a significant correlation between broad jump and best SAS-40 time trial for forward players but not for defensive players (r(2) = 0.75 p, 0.01; r(2) = 0.19 p = 0.28, respectively). In conclusion, results show that specific player ability needs to be taken into consideration when choosing off-ice tests.