Reworking the Gaps between Design and Ethnography
Reworking the Gaps between Design and Ethnography
复制标题
重塑设计与民族志之间的差距
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Darrah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vera D. Khovanskaya;Phoebe Sengers;Melissa Mazmanian;C. Darrah
自从Dourish对“设计的含义”提出批评以来，研究人员一直在问设计和人种学应该如何在HCI中联系起来。在这里，我们反思两个经验，交叉通知正在进行的民族志调查与早期阶段的研究通过设计。一种是用思考性设计来反思和告知关于中产阶级家庭忙碌的民族志田野调查；另一种是使用推测性设计来补充对农村技术基础设施的历史民族志的后期分析。我们不是试图通过无缝整合两个过程来消除民族志和设计之间的差距，而是通过缩小时间工作流程中的差距来重新设计民族志和设计之间的关系，同时保持两个角色表现的区别。我们发现这个新的差距导致了一系列的误解；但是，通过让这两个角色积极对话，我们能够化误解为互利。
Since Dourish's critique of 'implications for design' [15], researchers have asked how design and ethnography should or could relate in HCI. Here we reflect on two experiences with cross-informing ongoing ethnographic investigation with the early stages of research through design. One uses speculative design to reflect on and inform ethnographic fieldwork on busyness in middle-class familes; the other uses speculative design to complement late-stage analysis of a historical ethnography of rural technological infrastructure. Rather than trying to do away with the gap between ethnography and design by seamlessly integrating the two processes, we reworked the relationship between ethnography and design by closing the gap in the temporal workflows while simultaneously maintaining a distinction in the performance of the two roles. We found that this new gap resulted in a series of misunderstandings; but by putting the two roles in active dialogue, we were able leverage misunderstandings into mutual benefit.
民族志被认为是有害的
DOI：
10.1145/1518701.1518835
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Crabtree A
通讯作者：
Crabtree A