Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.002
复制
发表时间：
2004-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Kentridge, RW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Liversedge, SP;Rayner, K;Kentridge, RW
当他们阅读正常句子或带有掩蔽或消失文本的句子(其中注视的单词在60毫秒后消失或被掩蔽)时，他们的眼动被监测。本研究的目的是探讨(1)阅读中是否存在间隙效应；(2)语言和视觉因素对眼动控制的影响。一些对消失文本条件下眼动的全局分析的结果清楚地表明，阅读中不存在间隙效应。然而，对实验中一些局部测量的比较分析表明，认知/词汇过程。以及对视觉信息的持续吸收，都会影响阅读过程中的眼动控制。在整个注视过程中，持续的视觉物体会引起再注视，即使当注视的单词消失(或被掩蔽)时，词频和词长也会产生显著的影响。(C)2004爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
Readers' eye movements were monitored when they read either normal sentences or sentences with masked or disappearing text (in which the fixated word disappeared or was masked after 60 ms). The goals of the research were to investigate (1) whether a gap effect occurred in reading and (2) the influence of linguistic and visual factors on oculomotor control. The results of a number of global analyses of eye movements under disappearing text conditions clearly demostrated that there is no gap effect in reading. However, comparative analyses across a number of local Measures in the experiments indicated that cognitive/lexical processes. as well as the continual uptake of visual information, influence eye movement control during reading. A persistant visual object throughout fixation caused refixations and even when a fixated word had disappeared (or been masked), there were significant effects of word frequency and word length. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.