Development and validation of an in-competition emotion measure: the Brief In-Competition Emotion (BICE) scale
Development and validation of an in-competition emotion measure: the Brief In-Competition Emotion (BICE) scale
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102050
复制
发表时间：
2021-11
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Alexander W. J. Freemantle;L. Stafford;C. Wagstaff;L. Akehurst;D. V. Laar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alexander W. J. Freemantle;L. Stafford;C. Wagstaff;L. Akehurst;D. V. Laar
研究1采用专家分析法对39个情绪形容词进行内容效度检验，剔除9个情绪形容词，并对结果进行统计学分析。研究二以402名大学生运动员为被试，用剩余的30个形容词记录他们的比赛情绪，采用验证性因素分析和信度去除法编制了10个条目的BICE量表。研究3（N = 109）和研究4（N = 74）包括同时和预测效度评估的BICE scale.ResultsConstruct效度，信度和验证性因素分析完成在研究1和研究2导致在发展的10项BICE量表，包括五个复合情绪因素：愤怒，焦虑，兴奋，沮丧和幸福。从研究3和研究4的结果表明，BICE规模提出了可接受的水平的并发和预测validity.ConclusionsThe BICE规模是一个严格发展的吝啬规模，为研究人员提供了新的机会进行调查，并提供了应用从业人员与一个新的方法，评估在竞争中的干预效果。
ObjectivesWe aimed to develop a concise psychometric scale to assess athletes’ in-competition emotions, which would reduce the practical and conceptual limitations of previous measures.DesignFour studies were designed to develop and assess the validity of the new Brief In-Competition Emotion (BICE) scale.MethodIn Study 1, the content validity of 39 emotion adjectives was investigated using expert analysis, 9 adjectives were subsequently removed. In Study 2, 402 university athletes used the remaining 30 adjectives to record their in-competition emotions and confirmatory factor analyses and a reliability removal method was used to create the 10-item BICE scale. Study 3 (N = 109) and Study 4 (N = 74) consisted of both concurrent and predictive validity assessments of the BICE scale.ResultsConstruct validity, reliability and confirmatory factor analyses completed during Study 1 and Study 2 resulted in the development of the 10-item BICE scale, consisting of five composite emotion factors: anger, anxiety, excitement, dejection and happiness. The findings from Study 3 and Study 4 showed that the BICE scale presented acceptable levels of concurrent and predictive validity.ConclusionsThe BICE scale is a rigorously developed parsimonious scale which offers researchers new opportunities for investigation and provides applied practitioners with a new method of evaluating in-competition intervention efficacies.