The philosophy of logic
The philosophy of logic
复制标题
逻辑哲学
DOI：
10.2178/bsl.1804010
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Maddy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Maddy
这篇文章是一位即将退休的总统在符号逻辑协会的演讲稿。由于一些历史和社会学的原因，该协会的主要数学成员知道20世纪之交数学哲学中的三大流派-柏拉图主义，形式主义和直觉主义-但不熟悉逻辑哲学中的任何思想流派。这篇演讲试图通过与数学三巨头的粗略类比来介绍关于逻辑的哲学观点。沿着这条路，它勾勒了康德、19世纪德国科学唯物主义者弗雷格、密尔、早期维特根斯坦、卡尔纳普、艾耶尔、奎因和普特南的立场，并向笛卡尔、博尔扎诺和罗素做了手势，最后以第二种哲学选择结束。
what exactly are these logical This essay is the text of a retiring presidential address to the Association for Symbolic Logic. For a number of historical and sociological reasons, the largely mathematical membership of the Association is aware of the three great schools in the philosophy of mathematics at the turn of the 20th century—Platonism, Formalism, and Intuitionism—but unfamiliar with any school of thought in the philosophy of logic. This address was an effort to introduce the range of philosophical views about logic by rough analogy with the big three about mathematics. Along the way, it sketches the positions of Kant, the 19th-century German scientific materialists, Frege, Mill, early Wittgenstein, Carnap, Ayer, Quine, and Putnam, with gestures toward Descartes, Bolzano, and Russell, and ends with a second-philosophical alternative.