Validation of the Japanese Version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire
Validation of the Japanese Version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1539/joh.11-0220-oa
复制
发表时间：
2012-05-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Kawakami, Norito
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shimazu, Akihito;Sonnentag, Sabine;Kawakami, Norito
日本版恢复体验问卷的验证：东京大学医学研究生院精神卫生系Akihito Shimazu等人-目的：本研究的目的是验证日本版恢复体验问卷（REQ-J），该问卷评估个人在休闲时间如何放松和恢复工作（即，心理分离、放松、掌握和控制）。方法：通过互联网对来自不同职业的2,520名日本员工进行翻译和回译。进行探索性和验证性因素分析，以评估析因效度。通过对康复经验与潜在预测因素和后果的关系进行研究，以评估其结构效度。内部一致性检查，以评估其可靠性。结果：一系列验证性因素分析显示，假设的四因素模型拟合数据最好。结构效度普遍支持预期的相关性恢复经验与可能的预测和后果。四个分量表中每一个的Cronbach α系数都足够（0.85-0.89）。结论：本研究证实，REQ-J是一个足够的措施，可以在日本的背景下使用的恢复经验。（J Occup Health 2012; 54：196-205）
Validation of the Japanese Version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Akihito SHIMAZU, et aL Department of Mental Health, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine-Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate the Japanese version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ-J), which assesses how individuals unwind and recuperate from work during leisure time (i.e., psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery and control). Methods: The translated and back-translated REQ was administered via the Internet to 2,520 Japanese employees from various occupations. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate factorial validity. The relationship with potential predictors and consequences of recovery experiences were investigated to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency was examined to evaluate its reliability. Results: A series of confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the hypothesized four-factor model fit the data best. Construct validity was generally supported by expected correlations of recovery experiences with possible predictors and consequences. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each of the four subscales was sufficient (0.85-0.89). Conclusions: This study confirmed that the REQ-J is an adequate measure of recovery experiences that can be used in the Japanese context. (J Occup Health 2012; 54: 196-205)