A comparative suitability study between classification systems for BIM in heritage
A comparative suitability study between classification systems for BIM in heritage
复制标题
遗产 BIM 分类系统的比较适用性研究
DOI：
10.2495/sdp-v13-n1-130-138
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Usama Atteya
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Saleeb;M. Marzouk;Usama Atteya
本文件概述的研究是一个合作基金的一部分，该基金旨在为修复历史/文化遗产资产提出一个创新的分类框架。以前将BIM应用于遗产的大多数研究/应用都集中在资产的实物或几何报告上。这通常涉及激光扫描，用于创建竣工模型和记录资产组件，以用于操作和维护。然而，为了有效地识别/记录一般资产组件需求，必须使用标准化的分类系统，该系统对不同的组件、其特征、属性和维护要求进行分类。此外，正如将说明的那样，目前可用于新建筑的数据库、知识和分类系统可能不适合对历史建筑中的部件进行分类，这些部件因历史时代和建筑时期而有所不同，因此可能会使其修复过程效率低下。目前还没有专门研究用于遗产建筑的适当分类系统。本文对建筑行业内现行的国际分类系统进行了比较研究，并探讨了它们对遗产建筑的适用性。这包括CI/SFB、CAW、SFG20、OMNICLASS、UNICLASS版本等。还将调查适宜性的属性，例如对象类型、表格/明细表的层次、深度级别以及对不同建筑样式和参数几何形状(例如原点、材料、允许应力、比例等)的适宜性。这项研究为遗产缺乏适当的分类系统提供了证据，并为不同历史和建筑时期的遗产资产的适当分类系统的分类表示提出了建议。这包括等级等级、历史、社会和技术背景的信息描述符，允许使用标准化的遗产BIM数据进行文件编制、操作、维护和修复管理，还允许搜索全球遗产领域中不同建筑之间的相似/差异、替换部件和比较人工制品，这可能
影响着历史意义。
The research outlined in this paper is part of a collaborative fund to propose an innovative classification framework for restoration of historical/cultural heritage assets. Most of the previous research/applications in applying BIM to Heritage have focused on the physical or geometric reporting of assets. This typically involves laser scanning for creating as-built models and recording asset components, for operations and maintenance. However to efficiently identify/record general asset component requirements, standardised classification systems must be used which categorise different components, their characteristics, attributes, and maintenance requirements. Furthermore as will be demonstrated, current database, knowledge and classification systems available for new builds might not be suitable to categorise components in historical buildings, which differ according to historical eras and architectural periods, hence might render their restoration process inefficient. There is currently no research dedi- cated towards investigating appropriate classification systems to be used for heritage buildings. This paper provides a comparative study between current international classification systems within the construction industry, and investigates their suitability for heritage buildings. This includes CI/SFB, CAW, SFG20, Omniclass, Uniclass versions etc. Properties of suitability will also be investigated e.g. object types, hierarchy of tables/schedules, depth levels and appropriateness for different archi- tectural styles and parametric geometries (e.g. origin, material, allowed stresses, proportions etc.). This study provides evidence for the lack of appropriate classification systems for Heritage and provides recommendations for a taxonomical representation for suitable classification systems of Heritage assets from different historical and architectural periods. This includes information descriptors of hierarchical classes, historical, social and technological context, allowing usage of standardised Heritage BIM data for documentation, operations, maintenance and restoration management, and also allowing searching for similarities/differences between different buildings in the global heritage domain, replacement components and comparing artefacts, which might
impact historical significance.