REVIEW OF ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC EVIDENCE FAVORING VESICLE EXOCYTOSIS AS THE STRUCTURAL BASIS FOR QUANTAL RELEASE DURING SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION
REVIEW OF ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC EVIDENCE FAVORING VESICLE EXOCYTOSIS AS THE STRUCTURAL BASIS FOR QUANTAL RELEASE DURING SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION
复制标题
DOI:
10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003333
复制
发表时间:
1989-12-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
HEUSER, JE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
HEUSER, JE
Katz and colleagues epitomized the discipline of biophysics in their early electrophysiological analysis of synaptic transmission at frog neuromuscular junctions (Fatt& Katz, 1950, 1952; del Castillo & Katz, 1954, 1956). Using microelectrode recording that was state of the art for that day, they recorded long series of synaptic potentials that had been suppressed by calcium deprivation or magnesium supplementation (Fig. 1, from Fatt & Katz, 1952), then performed careful mathematical analysis of the amplitudes of these potentials (Fig. 2, from del Castillo & Katz, 1954), to demonstrate that they were composed ofone or more relatively constant'units' that had the same amplitude as certain spontaneous miniature electrical depolarizations which they had observed in earlier recordings from synaptic areas (Fig. 1). This led them to the'quantal hypothesis' of synaptic transmission: the idea that normal evoked synapticpotentials are composed of the simultaneous occurrence of small and uniform discharge events that otherwise occur spontaneously at very low frequency in the absence of evocation. This hypothesis found fertile ground in the first successful electronic micrographs of nerve/muscle synapses (De Robertis, 1958; Robertson, 1956, 1960a). These revealed an invariable presence in the presynapse of small membranous vesicles, which immediately suggested that the relatively uniform boluses of transmitter forming the quantal or unitary components of the synaptic potential might be contained within such membranous vesicles. This so-called'vesicle hypothesis', an extension of the original quantal hypothesis, is diagrammed in Fig. 3, from del Castillo & Katz, 1956.This combination of skilful application of new techniques, astute physical and mathematical analysis, and interpretive brilliance may well have been biophysics' finest hour. Indeed, the discipline itself was largely defined by these early activities, since they happened within the first Biophysics Department, carved out of an already innovative Physiology Department at University College London. The founder of this new department, A. V. Hill, described its special role as housing and (training) those'to whom physical intuitions come naturally, who can state a problem in physical terms, who can recognize physical relations when they turn up, who can express results in physical terms'. In thefascinating lecture from which that quote was drawn (Hill, 1954), Hill added:'These intellectual qualities, more than any special facility with physical instruments and methods, are essential to the make-up of a biophysicist'. B. Katz exemplified these special characteristics, and carrying on as director of the Biophysics Department after AV Hill, trained many individuals who subsequently became notables in the discipline worldwide. Now, as biophysics appears to be merging