VEIN, SILASTIC, AND POLYGLYCOLIC ACID FINE MESH - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY IN PERIPHERAL-NERVE REPAIR
VEIN, SILASTIC, AND POLYGLYCOLIC ACID FINE MESH - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY IN PERIPHERAL-NERVE REPAIR
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00000637-199509000-00008
复制
发表时间：
1995-09-01
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
ANDERSON, LD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
LOLLEY, RD;BOSE, WJ;ANDERSON, LD
我们使用大鼠模型研究了三种护套材料（自体静脉、硅橡胶和聚乙醇酸细网）。将四十只大鼠分为五组，每组八只。 A组动物接受坐骨神经横断但未进行修复。 B 组进行了标准的神经外修复术。在C、D和E组中，与a组一样修复神经，分别添加自体静脉、硅橡胶和聚乙醇酸细网鞘。使用坐骨功能指数、神经传导研究和光学显微镜评估神经再生和功能。与无鞘的标准神经外修复相比，鞘管方法没有显示出统计学上显着的优势。
We investigated three sheathing materials (autogenous vein, silastic, and polyglycolic acid fine mesh) using the rat model. Forty rats were divided into five groups of eight animals each. Group A animals underwent transection of the sciatic nerve hut had no repair. In Group B, a standard epineural repair was performed. In Groups C, D, and E the nerve was repaired as in Group a with the addition of autogenous vein, Silastic, and polyglycolic acid fine mesh sheaths, respectively. Nerve regeneration and function were assessed using sciatic functional index, nerve conduction studies, and light microscopy. Sheathing methods showed no statistically significant advantage to standard epineural repair without a sheath.