Baths and Bathing in Classical Antiquity

Baths and Bathing in Classical Antiquity
复制标题

古典时期的浴场和沐浴

DOI:
10.1080/03612759.1994.9949021
复制
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
History: Reviews of New Books
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
W. P. Kaldis
W. P. Kaldis
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. P. Kaldis

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

法老的埃及(1961)这部作品是从法文原版(Hisroire de L'Egypt ancienne,1988年)翻译而来,可读性很好。格里马尔记述了埃及的政治和经济历史,从人类开始在该地区定居到公元前332年希腊统治的到来。他将人类学和民族志研究融入他的历史中,并抹去了考古学和语言学之间的旧区别。格里马尔认为埃及是一个自格尔西时期以来连贯和不变的实体(c.公元前3500年)到基督教的到来(c。公元400年)。他声称,埃及从史前到历史的转变是一个缓慢的进化过程,而不是一场可以追溯到外部影响的技术革命,特别是从古埃及时期的Mesopotania。虽然格里马尔断言埃及历史开始时的本土发展是正确的,但他低估了其他影响的重要性是不正确的。大多数人确实会接受来自外部的突然冲击(B。Trigger,在Trigger等人,编辑:古代
Egypt of the Pharaohs (1961). This work is a translation from the French original (Hisroire de L’Egypt ancienne,(1 988) and is fair-ly readable. Grimal writes an account of the political and economic history of Egypt from the beginning of human settlement in the area to the advent of Greek rule in 332 BC He incorporates anthropological and ethnographic research in his history, and erases old distinctions between archaeology and philology.Grimal views Egypt as a coherent and unchanging entity from the Gerzean period (c. 3500 Bc) to the advent of Christianity (c. AD 400). He claims that the change from prehistory to history in Egypt was a slow process of evolution and not a technological revolution traced back to outside influence, notably from Uruk-period Mesopotania. Though Grimal is right to assert indigenous developments in the beginning of Egyptian history, he is incorrect in his discounting the importance of other influences. Most do accept a sudden impact from the outside (B. Trigger, in Trigger et al., Eds., Ancient