Successful resolution of severe graft versus host disease after liver transplantation correlating with disappearance of donor DNA from the peripheral blood
Successful resolution of severe graft versus host disease after liver transplantation correlating with disappearance of donor DNA from the peripheral blood
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1445-5994.1998.tb01563.x
复制
发表时间:
1998-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Grigg, AP
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Paizis, G;Tait, BD;Grigg, AP
While acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, it is seen rarely following solid organ transplantation. Since 1988, only 13 cases have been reported after liver transplantation.'.'The true incidence, however, is likely to be underestimated since mild cases may remain undiagnosed as the clinical features of fever, rash and diarrhoea can be misinterpreted as being of infectious origin in the post transplant setting. Not surprisingly, mortality in reported cases is high as these patients typically have severe, symptomatic and clinically apparent disease. Most of these patients have died of opportunistic infections in the context of prolonged disease-induced neutropenia and powerful immunosuppression therapy. Others who have su+ ived the disease have succumbed subsequently'to lymphoproliferative This report documents a severe form of GVHD following liver transplantation in which the prompt introduction of intensive immunosuppressive therapy together with growth factor support resulted in a successful outcome. We demonstrate a close correlation between the disappearance of donor DNA in the patient's peripheral blood and clinical resolution of the GVHD. A 56-year-old male of Italian background underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for chronic liver disease secondary to B, C and delta hepatitis. Routine triple immunosuppressive therapy was commenced post operatively with prednisolone azathioprine 1.5 mgilzgtday and cyclosporin 10 mg/kg/day. Intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin was given daily for the first week and then twice weekly. Pneumocystis prophylaxis was commenced with cotrimoxazole and the patient was discharged on the 18th postoperative day. He was admitted three days later with intermittent fevers to 38 C. Investigations for sepsis, including CMV cultures, were unrewarding and the fever failed to respond to broad spectrum antibiotics. On day 30 a maculopapular truncal rash appeared which involved the face and extremities. Both cotrimoxazole and hepatitis B immunoglobulin were ceased, as a drug eruption and serum sickness were possible aetiologies. A skin biopsy performed on day 36 demonstrated marked vacuolation of epidermal basal cells and scattered apoptotic necrosis, with lymphocytic infiltration of the epidermis, consistent with GVHD. In the two weeks after admission, he developed severe ulcerative oral mucositis, although without diarrhoea or abdominal pain, and progressive pancytopenia (despite cessation of azothiaprine on day 27) with a nadir haemoglobin of 5.7 g/dL and neutrophil count of 0.3 X 109L on day 38 (Figure 1). The platelet nadir of 59X 1 0 9 L occurred on day 50 and normalised two weeks later. A ten day treatment course with OKT3 5 mg daily and high dose methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily initially, tapering to 100 mg over one week, was commenced on day 36. Cyclosporin was discontinued and replaced with tacrolimus 5 mg bd. The swinging fevers resolved within 12 hours of the administration of high dose steroids. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 pglkglday was commenced on day 36 and resulted by day 40 in an increase in neutrophil count which persisted thereafter (Figure 1). Ganciclovir was given prophylactically for CMV reactivation. Topical antifungals were administered and he was nursed in isolation. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin was recommenced and nebulised pentamidine 300 mg given for ongoing pneumocystis prophylaxis.