The "Philosophy of Liberation," the Postmodern Debate and Latin American Studies
The "Philosophy of Liberation," the Postmodern Debate and Latin American Studies
复制标题
“解放哲学”、后现代争论与拉丁美洲研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Derrida
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Deleuze;J. Derrida
20世纪90年代末，拉丁美洲和美国的拉丁美洲学者（哲学家、文学评论家和人类学家，以及历史学家、社会学家等）构建的有效理论框架已经多样化，并且变得如此复杂，以至于有必要绘制这些立场的地形图，以深化辩论。换句话说，在理论和解释性话语中，主题的视角、范畴和“本地化”的层面发生了如此大的变化，以至于如果没有对其理论和概念基础的初步了解，就很难继续拉丁美洲的辩论。古老的拉丁美洲主义（“拉丁美洲主义1”）似乎已经成为博物馆的展品，而不是任何讨论中必不可少的参考点。那么，让我们简要地看看辩论中的地形，知道这只是对该领域的“一种”可能的解释。这只是说明辩论内容的一个出发点。
The operative theoretical framework that was constructed in the late 90s, as much within Latin America as by Latin American scholars in the United States (philosophers, literary critics and anthropologists, as well as historians, sociologists, etc.), has diversified and acquired such complexity that it has become necessary to map a topography of these positions in order to deepen the debate. In other words, the perspectives, the categories, the planes of "localization" of subjects within theoretical and interpretative discourse have changed so much that it has become difficult to continue the Latin American debate without a preliminary understanding of its theoretical and conceptual basis. The old Latin Americanism ("Latin Americanism 1") seems to have become a museum-object rather than an obligatory point of reference in any discussion. Let us, then, briefly look at said topography on the debate, knowing that it is only "one" possible interpretation of the field. This is just a point of departure to illustrate the terms of the debate.