Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques?
Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.005
复制
发表时间：
2005-09-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Feine, JS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kawai, Y;Murakami, H;Feine, JS
目的：比较两种不同方法制作的全口义齿的质量。本研究采用随机对照的临床试验方法，比较传统（T）和简化（S）方法制作全口义齿的患者在分娩后3个月和6个月的满意度、舒适度和功能评分。修复体的质量进行了评价，由prosthodontists在6 months.Materials和方法：一百二十二个配偶和女性无牙个体，年龄在45-75岁，被随机分配到组，接受义齿与T或S的方法。结果：两组患者的总体满意度评分无显著性差异（P > 0. 05），两组患者的总体满意度评分无显著性差异（P > 0. 05（3个月：平均T=83 mm，平均S=83 mm，P= 0.97; 6个月：平均T=79 mm，平均S=79 mm，P=0.96）或修复医师对义齿质量的评级（T= 66，S = 63; P= 0. 96）。38）.结论：这些结果表明，全口义齿的质量不会受到影响时，简化制造技术，以节省时间和材料。牙科教育工作者在重新设计口腔修复培训课程时应考虑这些发现。(c)2005爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
Obectives: To compare the quality of conventional complete dentures fabricated with two different techniques. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare traditional (T) and simplified (S) methods of making complete conventional dentures on patients' ratings of satisfaction, comfort and function at 3 and 6 months following delivery. The quality of the prostheses was rated by prosthodontists at 6 months.Materials and methods: One hundred twenty-two mate and female edentulous individuals, aged 45-75 years, were randomly allocated into groups that received dentures made with either T or S methods. Following delivery, patients' ratings of several denture-related factors were measured using 100 mm visual analogue scales, and denture quality was assessed by blinded prosthodontists using ratings on a validated quantitative scale.Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient ratings for overall satisfaction (3 months: mean T=83 mm, mean S=83 mm, P= 0.97; 6 months: mean T=79 mm, mean S=79 mm, P=0.96) or in prosthodontists' ratings of denture quality (T= 66, S = 63; P= 0. 38).Conclusion: These results show that the quality of complete dentures does not suffer when manufacturing techniques are simplified to save time and materials. Dental educators should consider these findings when re-designing prosthodontic training programs. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.