Using Rich Data on Comorbidities in Case-Control Study Design with Electronic Health Record Data Improves Control of Confounding in the Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions.
Using Rich Data on Comorbidities in Case-Control Study Design with Electronic Health Record Data Improves Control of Confounding in the Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0164304
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Wei Y
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Backenroth D;Chase H;Friedman C;Wei Y
Recent research has suggested that the case-control study design, unlike the self-controlled study design, performs poorly in controlling confounding in the detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from administrative claims and electronic health record (EHR) data, resulting in biased estimates of the causal effects of drugs on health outcomes of interest (HOI) and inaccurate confidence intervals. Here we show that using rich data on comorbidities and automatic variable selection strategies for selecting confounders can better control confounding within a case-control study design and provide a more solid basis for inference regarding the causal effects of drugs on HOIs. Four HOIs are examined: acute kidney injury, acute liver injury, acute myocardial infarction and gastrointestinal ulcer hospitalization. For each of these HOIs we use a previously published reference set of positive and negative control drugs to evaluate the performance of our methods. Our methods have AUCs that are often substantially higher than the AUCs of a baseline method that only uses demographic characteristics for confounding control. Our methods also give confidence intervals for causal effect parameters that cover the expected no effect value substantially more often than this baseline method. The case-control study design, unlike the self-controlled study design, can be used in the fairly typical setting of EHR databases without longitudinal information on patients. With our variable selection method, these databases can be more effectively used for the detection of ADRs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
46.9
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Li, Ying;Ryan, Patrick B.;Friedman, Carol
通讯作者:
Friedman, Carol
影响因子:
3
作者:
Schneeweiss, Sebastian;Patrick, Amanda R.;Glynn, Robert J.
通讯作者:
Glynn, Robert J.
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Meyboom, RHB;Egberts, ACG;Gribnau, FWJ
通讯作者:
Gribnau, FWJ
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Madigan, David;Schuemie, Martijn J.;Ryan, Patrick B.
通讯作者:
Ryan, Patrick B.