On the application of the IMA-CNMNC dominant-valency rule to complex mineral compositions
On the application of the IMA-CNMNC dominant-valency rule to complex mineral compositions
复制标题
DOI:
10.1180/mgm.2019.55
复制
发表时间:
2019-10-01
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Mills, Stuart J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bosi, Ferdinando;Hatert, Frederic;Mills, Stuart J.
Mineral species should be identified by an end-member formula and by using the dominant-valency rule as recommended by the IMA-CNMNC. However, the dominant-end-member approach has also been used in the literature. These two approaches generally converge, but for some intermediate compositions, significant differences between the dominant-valency rule and the dominant end-member approach can be observed. As demonstrated for garnet-supergroup minerals, for example, the end-member approach is ambiguous, as end-member proportions strongly depend on the calculation sequence. For this reason, the IMA-CNMNC strongly recommends the use of the dominant-valency rule for mineral nomenclature, because it alone may lead to unambiguous mineral identification. Although the simple application of the dominant-valency rule is successful for the identification of many mineral compositions, sometimes it leads to unbalanced end-member formulae, due to the occurrence of a coupled heterovalent substitution at two sites along with a heterovalent substitution at a single site. In these cases, it may be useful to use the site-total-charge approach to identify the dominant root-charge arrangement on which to apply the dominant-constituent rule. The dominant-valency rule and the site-totalcharge approach may be considered two procedures complementary to each other for mineral identification. Their critical point is to find the most appropriate root-charge and atomic arrangements consistent with the overriding condition dictated by the end-member formula. These procedures were approved by the IMA-CNMNC in May 2019.