Convenience voting

Convenience voting
复制标题

DOI:
10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912
复制
发表时间:
2008-01-01
影响因子:
10.8
通讯作者:
Toffey, Daniel
Toffey, Daniel
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gronke, Paul;Galanes-Rosenbaum, Eva;Toffey, Daniel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在最近的选举中,便利投票的形式——提前亲自投票、邮寄投票、缺席投票、电子投票和传真投票——已经成为近30%的美国人的选择模式。尽管如此,尽管美国几乎每个州都至少采用了一种方便投票形式,但关于这些做法的学术研究在重要问题上分布不均。关于投票率的大量文献与关于竞选效果、选举成本、选票质量和欺诈风险的研究缺乏相抵消。本文介绍了方便投票的理论,回顾了目前的文献,并提出了未来的研究方向。
Forms of convenience voting-early in-person voting, voting by mail, absentee voting, electronic voting, and voting by fax-have become the mode ofchoice for > 30% ofAmericans in recent elections. Despite this, and atthoughnearly every state in the United States has adopted at least one form of convenience voting, the academic research on these practices is unequally distributed across important questions. A great deal of literature on turnout is counterbalanced by a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud. This article introduces the theory of convenience voting, reviews the current literature, and suggests areas for future research.