Modeling the impact of parking price policy on free-floating carsharing: Case study for Zurich, Switzerland

Modeling the impact of parking price policy on free-floating carsharing: Case study for Zurich, Switzerland
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.022
复制
发表时间:
2017-04-01
影响因子:
8.3
通讯作者:
Axhausen, Kay W.
Axhausen, Kay W.
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Balac, Milos;Ciari, Francesco;Axhausen, Kay W.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

关于汽车共享的研究已经表明,不可忽视的一部分汽车共享成员在加入汽车共享计划后放弃了车辆,或者避免购买车辆。这可以说减少了所需的整体停车空间。这可能是汽车共享计划对交通系统最重要的影响之一,但也是研究最少的影响之一。自由浮动的汽车共享的快速扩散,就其本质而言,可能对停车产生更大的影响,使得汽车共享和停车之间的关系成为新研究的一个有吸引力的话题。这项工作提出了一种方法,这种关系的调查,使用基于代理的模拟,并探讨了不同的停车价格对自由浮动的汽车共享在瑞士苏黎世市的需求的影响。在苏黎世市的三个层次的自由浮动车队规模加上三个层次的停车价格进行了模拟。结果表明,自由浮动的车辆能够更有效地使用停车位比私家车。此外,随着自由浮动汽车共享车队规模的增加和停车价格的增加,平均停车占用率趋于均匀,从而避免了空间停车压力峰值。(C)2017爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有
The research on carsharing has already shown that a non-negligible part of carsharing members give up a vehicle after joining a carsharing program, or avoid a vehicle purchase. This arguably reduces overall parking space needed. This might well be one of the most important impacts of a carsharing program on the transportation system, but also one of the least researched. The rapid diffusion of free-floating carsharing, which for its very nature might have a stronger impact on parking, makes the relationship between carsharing and parking an appealing topic for new research. This work presents a method for the investigation of this relationship using an agent-based simulation and explores the impacts of different parking prices on the demand for free-floating carsharing in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. Three levels of free-floating fleet-size in the city of Zurich coupled with three levels of parking prices were simulated. The obtained results show that free-floating vehicles are able to use parking spaces more efficiently than private vehicles. Moreover, the average parking occupancy tends to be more homogeneous with higher fleet-size of free-floating carsharing and with the increase of parking prices, thus avoiding spatial parking pressure peaks. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.