Comparison of conflict of interest policies and reported practices in academic medical centers in the United States.
Comparison of conflict of interest policies and reported practices in academic medical centers in the United States.
复制标题
美国学术医疗中心的利益冲突政策和报告实践的比较。
DOI：
10.1080/08989620601003414
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sugarman,Jeremy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dinan,MichaelaA;Weinfurt,KevinP;Friedman,JoëlleY;Allsbrook,JenniferS;Gottlieb,Julie;Schulman,KevinA;Hall,MarkA;Dhillon,JatinderK;Sugarman,Jeremy
作者回顾了美国9个学术医疗中心的利益冲突政策，并采访了这些机构的机构审查委员会（IRB）和利益冲突委员会（COIC）的成员。他们发现，许多机构使用的报告和管理利益冲突的程序比其政策中描述的程序更加分散。此外，大多数机构没有明确和全面的政策来指导调查人员向潜在的研究参与者披露利益冲突。在IRB和COIC官员之间观察到对利益冲突政策的理解存在相当大的差异。
The authors reviewed the conflict of interest policies of 9 academic medical centers in the United States and interviewed members of the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Conflict of Interest Committees (COICs) at those institutions. They found that many institutions used processes for reporting and managing conflicts of interest that were more decentralized than the processes described in their policies. Also, most institutions had no clear and comprehensive policy to guide investigators regarding disclosure of conflicts of interest to potential research participants. Considerable differences in understanding of conflict of interest policies were observed between IRB and COIC officials.