The Fovea-Protective Impact of Double-Layer Sign in Eyes With Foveal-Sparing Geographic Atrophy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

The Fovea-Protective Impact of Double-Layer Sign in Eyes With Foveal-Sparing Geographic Atrophy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1167/iovs.63.11.4
复制
发表时间:
2022-10-03
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的目的是调查双层征(DLS)对中心凹保留的地图状萎缩(GA)和年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的GA进展的影响。这是一个回顾性的连续病例系列,随访时间超过6个月,患有继发于AMD的中心凹保留GA。在第一次和最后一次访视时,在眼底自发荧光图像上测量中心凹保留区域的大小。评价每只眼睛在中心凹保留区域内是否存在DLS。我们根据保留中心凹区域内DLS的存在对眼睛进行分级,并比较两组之间GA的进展(DLS(+)与DLS(-))。我们确定了25只至少进行了2次随访的黄斑中心凹保留性GA患眼(两次随访之间的平均间隔= 22.7 ± 11.8个月)。基线时平均中心凹保留面积为1.74 ± 0.87 mm 2(范围= 0.42-4.14 mm 2),末次访视时为1.26 ± 0.75 mm 2(范围= 0.25-2.92 mm 2)。17只眼(65.3%)在中心凹保留区域内被分级为DLS(+)。与DLS(+)组(0.088 ± 0.052 mm/年; P = 0.04)相比,DLS(-)组(0.149 ± 0.078 mm/年)中GA向中央凹的平方根进展明显更快。DLS(-)组显示出比DLS(+)组更快的向心GA进展。我们的数据表明,DLS的存在下,在备用中心凹区可能是一个保护因素,对中心凹进展的GA与AMD的眼睛。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of double-layer sign (DLS) on geographic atrophy (GA) progression in eyes with foveal-sparing GA and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This is a retrospective, consecutive case series of eyes with foveal-sparing GA secondary to AMD with more than 6 months of follow-up. The size of the foveal-sparing area was measured on the fundus autofluorescence images at the first and last visits. Each eye was evaluated for the presence or absence of DLS inside the foveal-sparing area. We graded eyes based on the presence of DLS within the foveal-sparing area and compared the progression of GA between two groups (DLS (+) versus DLS (−)). We identified 25 eyes with foveal-sparing GA with at least 2 follow-up visits (average interval = 22.7 ± 11.8 months between visits). The mean foveal sparing area was 1.74 ± 0.87 mm2 (range = 0.42–4.14 mm2) at baseline and 1.26 ± 0.75 mm2 (range = 0.25–2.92 mm2) at the last visit. Seventeen eyes (65.3%) were graded as DLS (+) within the foveal-sparing area. Square root progression of GA toward the fovea was significantly faster in the DLS (−) eyes (0.149 ± 0.078 mm/year) compared to the DLS (+) group (0.088 ± 0.052 mm/year; P = 0.04). The DLS (−) group showed significantly faster centripetal GA progression than the DLS (+) group. Our data suggest that the presence of DLS in the spared foveal area could be a protective factor against foveal progression of GA in eyes with AMD.
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1407
发表时间: 2021-05-20
期刊: JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY
影响因子: 8.1
作者:
Colijn, Johanna M.;Liefers, Bart;Klaver, Caroline C. W.
通讯作者: Klaver, Caroline C. W.
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.01.019
发表时间: 2022-06-06
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Chan, Clement K.;Lalezary, Maziar;Yiu, Glenn
通讯作者: Yiu, Glenn
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01285-0
发表时间: 2020-11-24
期刊: EYE
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Ghanchi, Faruque D.;Fulcher, Corinne;Mdanat, Faris
通讯作者: Mdanat, Faris
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003207
发表时间: 2021-12-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Eshtiaghi, Arshia;Issa, Mariam;Kertes, Peter J.
通讯作者: Kertes, Peter J.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.027
发表时间: 2015-07-01
期刊: OPHTHALMOLOGY
影响因子: 13.7
作者:
Lindner, Moritz;Boeker, Alexander;Fleckenstein, Monika
通讯作者: Fleckenstein, Monika