Restoring Meaning to Supervision Through a Peer Consultation Group in Rural Australia

Restoring Meaning to Supervision Through a Peer Consultation Group in Rural Australia
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02650533.2014.896785
复制
发表时间:
2014-10-02
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Pawar, Manohar
Pawar, Manohar
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bailey, (Isobel) Ruth;Bell, Karen;Pawar, Manohar

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

描述了在澳大利亚地区建立跨学科同行咨询小组的情况。讨论了一个研究项目,该项目利用小组前和小组后评估调查以及外部促进的小组评估会议的数据,探讨了同行协商对参与者的影响。主要调查结果揭示了获得不同监督模式的价值;监督的重要性,而不是感觉受到监视;以及同行协商的积极经验对参与者福祉的贡献。这项研究还显示,地区大学赞助专业同行咨询可能会改善实践界和学术界的联系并实现互惠互利。当代职场咨询监督安排的有效性,以及在同行咨询小组中参与案例讨论的乐趣究竟是由什么构成的,是值得进一步探索的领域。
The establishment of a cross-discipline peer consultation group in regional Australia is described. A research project, which explored the impact of the peer consultation on participants, using pre-group and post-group evaluation surveys along with data from an externally facilitated group evaluation session is discussed. Key findings reveal the value of access to varied modes of supervision; the importance of supervision not feeling like being subjected to surveillance; and the contribution that positive experiences of peer consultation have for our participants' well-being. The potential for improved connection and mutual benefits for practice and academia in sponsorship of professional peer consultation by regional universities also emerges from this research. The effectiveness of contemporary workplace counselling supervision arrangements, and of what, precisely, the enjoyment of engaging in case discussions in peer consultation groups is constituted are areas for more exploration.