Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
复制
发表时间:
2001-10
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
V. Belton;T. Stewart
V. Belton;T. Stewart
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
V. Belton;T. Stewart

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

多标准决策分析(MCDA)领域,也称为多标准决策辅助,或多标准决策制定(MCDM),在过去的四分之一世纪中得到了迅速发展,在此过程中出现了许多不同的思想流派。这可能使新进入该领域的人难以全面了解各种工具和方法,这些工具和方法可帮助决策者处理在相互冲突的利益和目标之间寻求妥协或协商一致的一贯困难,即“多重标准”。哲学和模型的多样性使得MCDA的潜在用户,即管理科学家和/或面临涉及冲突目标的问题的决策者,同样难以清楚地了解哪种方法适合他们的特定背景。我们写这本书的目的是提供一个全面而广泛的MCDA主流思想概述。我们的目标是为读者提供对基本哲学和理论的充分认识,对方法的实际细节的理解,以及对实践的洞察力,使他们能够以知情的方式实施任何方法。正如本书的标题所示,我们的重点是发展MCDA的综合观点,我们认为这既包括MCDA内部不同思想流派的整合,也包括MCDA与更广泛的管理理论、科学和实践的整合。
The field of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA), also termed multiple criteria decision aid, or multiple criteria decision making (MCDM), has developed rapidly over the past quarter century and in the process a number of divergent schools of thought have emerged. This can make it difficult for a new entrant into the field to develop a comprehensive appreciation of the range of tools and approaches which are available to assist decision makers in dealing with the ever-present difficulties of seeking compromise or consensus between conflicting inter ests and goals, ie the" multiple criteria". The diversity of philosophies and models makes it equally difficult for potential users of MCDA, ie management scientists and/or decision makers facing problems involving conflicting goals, to gain a clear understanding of which methodologies are appropriate to their particular context. Our intention in writing this book has been to provide a compre hensive yet widely accessible overview of the main streams of thought within MCDA. We aim to provide readers with sufficient awareness of the underlying philosophies and theories, understanding of the practi cal details of the methods, and insight into practice to enable them to implement any of the approaches in an informed manner. As the title of the book indicates, our emphasis is on developing an integrated view of MCDA, which we perceive to incorporate both integration of differ ent schools of thought within MCDA, and integration of MCDA with broader management theory, science and practice.