Occupation, Worker Vulnerability, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.
Occupation, Worker Vulnerability, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.080
复制
发表时间:
2022-12-12
期刊:
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Virus Watch Collaborative
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Beale S;Burns R;Braithwaite I;Byrne T;Lam Erica Fong W;Fragaszy E;Geismar C;Hoskins S;Kovar J;Navaratnam AMD;Nguyen V;Patel P;Yavlinsky A;Van Tongeren M;Aldridge RW;Hayward A;Virus Watch Collaborative
Occupational disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake can impact the effectiveness of vaccination programmes and introduce particular risk for vulnerable workers and those with high workplace exposure. This study aimed to investigate COVID-19 vaccine uptake by occupation, including for vulnerable groups and by occupational exposure status. We used data from employed or self-employed adults who provided occupational information as part of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study (n = 19,595) and linked this to study-obtained information about vulnerability-relevant characteristics (age, medical conditions, obesity status) and work-related COVID-19 exposure based on the Job Exposure Matrix. Participant vaccination status for the first, second, and third dose of any COVID-19 vaccine was obtained based on linkage to national records and study records. We calculated proportions and Sison-Glaz multinomial 95% confidence intervals for vaccine uptake by occupation overall, by vulnerability-relevant characteristics, and by job exposure. Vaccination uptake across occupations ranged from 89-96% for the first dose, 87–94% for the second dose, and 75–86% for the third dose, with transport, trade, service and sales workers persistently demonstrating the lowest uptake. Vulnerable workers tended to demonstrate fewer between-occupational differences in uptake than non-vulnerable workers, although clinically vulnerable transport workers (76%-89% across doses) had lower uptake than several other occupational groups (maximum across doses 86%–96%). Workers with low SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk had higher vaccine uptake (86%-96% across doses) than those with elevated or high risk (81–94% across doses). Differential vaccination uptake by occupation, particularly amongst vulnerable and highly-exposed workers, is likely to worsen occupational and related socioeconomic inequalities in infection outcomes. Further investigation into occupational and non-occupational factors influencing differential uptake is required to inform relevant interventions for future COVID-19 booster rollouts and similar vaccination programmes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Hajure M;Tariku M;Bekele F;Abdu Z;Dule A;Mohammedhussein M;Tsegaye T
通讯作者:
Tsegaye T
DOI:
10.15585/mmwr.mm7030a2externalicon
发表时间:
2021-07-30
影响因子:
33.9
作者:
Lee, James T.;Althomsons, Sandy P.;Patel, Suchita A.
通讯作者:
Patel, Suchita A.
DOI:
10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.50.2001884
发表时间:
2020-12
期刊:
Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
影响因子:
--
作者:
de Gier B;de Oliveira Bressane Lima P;van Gaalen RD;de Boer PT;Alblas J;Ruijten M;van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB;Waegemaekers T;Schreijer A;van den Hof S;Hahné SJ
通讯作者:
Hahné SJ
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2116597
发表时间:
2022-02-24
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Eyre DW;Taylor D;Purver M;Chapman D;Fowler T;Pouwels KB;Walker AS;Peto TEA
通讯作者:
Peto TEA
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Fogh K;Strange JE;Scharff BFSS;Eriksen ARR;Hasselbalch RB;Bundgaard H;Nielsen SD;Jørgensen CS;Erikstrup C;Norsk J;Nielsen PB;Kristensen JH;Østergaard L;Ellermann-Eriksen S;Andersen B;Nielsen H;Johansen IS;Wiese L;Simonsen L;Fischer TK;Folke F;Lippert F;Ostrowski SR;Benfield T;Mølbak K;Ethelberg S;Koch A;Sönksen UW;Vangsted AM;Krause TG;Fomsgaard A;Ullum H;Skov R;Iversen K
通讯作者:
Iversen K