The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action
The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
复制
发表时间：
2004-06-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Walther, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eyal, T;Liberman, N;Walther, E
目前的研究表明，在考虑锡的行动。反对(反)行动的考虑往往从属于有利于(有利于)线圈中的行动的考虑，即只有在有利水平足够的情况下才考虑有利的行动，而有利因素被认为与螺旋水平无关(研究I A和I B)。因此，作者得出结论：积极因素构成了比不利因素更高的识解水平，并根据时间解释过程(Y.trope&N.Liberman，2003)预测，对于更遥远的未来，积极因素将更加显著，而反之则应适用于不利因素。正如预测的那样，参与者对预计将在更遥远的未来进行的新考试程序(研究2)、公共政策(研究3)以及个人和人际行为(研究4-6)产生了更多的赞成和更少的反对。这项研究还考察了这些转变的限制条件和评估结果。
The present research demonstrated that in considering tin action. considerations against (con) the action tend to be subordinate to considerations in favor of (pro) the action in that coils are considered only if the level of pros is sufficient, whereas pros are considered independent of the level Of Coils (Studies I A and I B). The authors therefore concluded that pros constitute a higher construal level than cons and predict, on the basis of temporal construal processes (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), that pros would be more salient in making decisions for the more distant future, whereas the reverse Should hold for cons. As predicted, participants generated more pros and fewer cons toward new exam procedures (Study 2), public policies (Study 3), and personal and interpersonal behaviors (Studies 4-6) that were expected to take place in the more distant future. This research also examined the limiting conditions and the evaluative consequences of these shifts.