Anatomy curriculum for medical students What can be learned for future curricula from evaluations and questionnaires completed by students, anatomists and clinicians in different countries?
Anatomy curriculum for medical students What can be learned for future curricula from evaluations and questionnaires completed by students, anatomists and clinicians in different countries?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.aanat.2009.08.007
复制
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Pabst, Reinhard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pabst, Reinhard
近年来，一场国际性的辩论在“医学课程中需要多少解剖学？”解剖应该被解剖或电脑辅助学习所取代吗？".这篇文章将处理。公布了关于学生解剖学知识评估、解剖学家记录的不同教学形式经验以及负责住院医师方案的临床医生对青年医生解剖学知识评估的数据。由于教学时数、教学方法的类型、医学生以前的资格、示范者的人数和资格以及其他一些参数的差异很大，因此不可能假定一个机构和/或国家的经验对另一个机构和/或国家有效。然而，迫切需要资助评估解剖学课程的研究方案，包括长期研究，因为医学课程的目标是训练有素的医生。关于以问题为基础的学习课程的优点或缺点，没有令人信服的数据公布。解剖学协会/学会的大会应包括教学方面的会议，医学系的决策者应了解国际上记录的解剖学的利弊，不仅是为了本科生，也是为了医生的专业化。(C)2009年Elsevier GmbH。All rights reserved.
In recent years an international debate has culminated in the questions "How much anatomy is necessary in the medical curriculum?" and "Should dissection be replaced by prosection or computer-aided learning?". This article will deal. with data published on evaluations of the anatomical knowledge of students, on experience with different teaching forms documented by anatomists, and on the assessment of the anatomical knowledge of young doctors by clinicians responsible for residency programmes. Due to the great variability in the number of teaching hours, type of teaching methods, previous qualifications of medical students, number and qualification of demonstrators and several other parameters it is impossible to assume experiences in one institute and/or country to be valid for another. However, there is an urgent need to fund research programmes evaluating the anatomy curriculum including Long-term studies, as the aim of the medical curriculum is the well-trained medical doctor. No convincing data have been published on the advantages or disadvantages of problem-based learning curricula. Congresses of anatomical associations/societies should include sessions on teaching aspects, and the decision makers in medical faculties should be informed about internationally documented pro and cons of anatomy, not only for the undergraduates but also for the specialization of physicians. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.