Detection of aberrant responding on a personality scale in a military sample: an application of evaluating person fit with two-level logistic regression.
Detection of aberrant responding on a personality scale in a military sample: an application of evaluating person fit with two-level logistic regression.
复制标题
检测军事样本中人格量表的异常反应：使用两级逻辑回归评估人员适应性的应用。
DOI：
10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.159
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Turkheimer,Eric
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Woods,CarolM;Oltmanns,ThomasF;Turkheimer,Eric
个人适合性评估用于识别对测试或问卷做出异常反应的人。本研究采用SP Reise(2000)的二水平Logistic回归方法对新兵(N=2,026)使用的13个非适应性与适应性人格量表(SNAP；L.Clark，1996)进行了评价。结果表明，在5个SNAP量表(去抑制、权利、表现主义、负性气质和工作狂)中，该量表对某些人比对另一些人更具区分性。用几个协变量探讨了异常反应的可能原因。在所有5个量表上，严重的病理表现是对反应的关键影响，并且有证据表明差异测试在性别、种族或两者兼而有之方面起作用。其他潜在的异常来源是粗心大意、反应随意或不合作。社会可取性没有预期的那么有影响力。(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA，保留所有权利)
Person-fit assessment is used to identify persons who respond aberrantly to a test or questionnaire. In this study, SP Reise's (2000) method for evaluating person fit using 2-level logistic regression was applied to 13 personality scales of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; L. Clark, 1996) that had been administered to military recruits (N= 2,026). Results revealed significant person-fit heterogeneity and indicated that for 5 SNAP scales (Disinhibition, Entitlement, Exhibitionism, Negative Temperament, and Workaholism), the scale was more discriminating for some people than for others. Possible causes of aberrant responding were explored with several covariates. On all 5 scales, severe pathology emerged as a key influence on responses, and there was evidence of differential test functioning with respect to gender, ethnicity, or both. Other potential sources of aberrancy were carelessness, haphazard responding, or uncooperativeness. Social desirability was not as influential as expected.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)