ASAS PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN KONVENSI PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA ANTI KORUPSI 2003
ASAS PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN KONVENSI PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA ANTI KORUPSI 2003
复制标题
ASAS PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM SYSTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN KONVENSI PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA ANTI KORUPSI 2003
DOI：
10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.101-132
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lilik Mulyadi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lilik Mulyadi
本文介绍了印度尼西亚刑法体系中关于2003年《联合国反腐败公约》（UNCAC）的腐败犯罪举证责任转移的研究结果中的一些问题。有两个基本问题成为研究对象，一是刑事法院在腐败案件中在多大程度上实施了举证责任转移，二是立法政策在多大程度上适用与2003年《联合国反腐败公约》有关的举证责任转移。本文采用规范研究方法，包括监管方法、概念方法、案例方法和比较方法。这种研究强调解释和法律的建构，以获得一些法律的规范、概念、规则清单及其在具体案例中的实施。在立法机构中如何认识、注意、一致和协调腐败犯罪举证责任转移的规定和概念方法。案例方法使用印度尼西亚与其他国家之间关于腐败犯罪人举证责任倒置的比较法。这项研究表明，在印度尼西亚的腐败案件中，举证责任的转移从未适用过。这些经验与香港和印度的反腐败经验不同，它们在与被告人财产或资产有关的问题上采用了所谓平衡盖然性原则的方法来实施举证责任倒置。印尼的腐败规制政策，尤其是第12 B、37、37 A、38 B条，显然与2003年《联合国反腐败公约》（KAK 2003）中关于突然收取财产、转移举证责任的规定不太协调。因此，有必要对具有预防性、抑制性和恢复性特点的突发性财富罪举证责任倒置的提法进行修改.关键词：举证责任倒置，腐败犯罪，刑事司法制度
This article describes some problems of the result of research regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offences in the Indonesian system of criminal law with regards UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. There are two basic questions which become the research objections, firstly: to what extent the shifting of burden of proof has been implemented in the criminal court regarding corruption cases, and secondly, to what extent does the legislation policy apply for the shifting of burden of proof in relation with UNCAC 2003. The article uses normative research which regulation, conceptual, case and comparative approach. Such research emphasizes interpretation and legal construction to obtain some legal norms, conception, regulation list and its implementation in concreto cases. Regulation and conceptual approach to used how to know, existention, consistency and harmonization regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offences in legislation body. The cases approach uses comparative law regarding the reversal burden of proof upon corruption offencer between Indonesia and the other countries. This research shows that the shifting of burden of proof has never yet applied for in the corruption cases Indonesia. Those experiences is not similar with the experiences of against corruption Hong Kong and India, wihich implement the reversal burden of proof by using some approach socalled balanced probability of principles in the relation to the property or asset of defendant comes from. The Indonesian corruption regulation policy, especialy article 12B, 37, 37A, 38B apparently it’s not cleaq and disharmony to norm of sudden charge of fortune the shifting of burden of proof formulation in connection with United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2003(KAK 2003). So, necessary (needs) of modification sudden charge of fortune shifting of burden of proof formulation which preventive, represive and restorative characteristic. Keywords: Shifting the Burden of Proof, Corruption Offences, Criminal Justice System