Notes on substantance in orthodox theory: a reply to Badano.
Notes on substantance in orthodox theory: a reply to Badano.
复制标题
关于正统理论实质的注释：对巴达诺的答复。
DOI：
10.1136/medethics-2018-105030
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Smith,WilliamR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Smith,WilliamR
加布里埃莱·巴达诺（Gabriele Badano）对我对生物伦理学正统理论家族的挑战提出了三点批评。首先，我假设了一个“过于简化的正统版本”。其次，我没有意识到它的应用领域。第三，我只是讨论了正统理论家将实体作为“事后思考”的方式--即便如此，我也只是对戈帕尔·斯里尼瓦桑的论点进行了反驳。在这里，我对每一个问题都做出了回应，在第一个和第三个问题结束之前，我对第二个问题进行了反思。第一个低估了对简化版本的批评提供给更复杂的亲属的洞察力。第三部分是对我的观点与斯里尼瓦桑的观点之间的关系的分析，忽略了我的论文的一个完整论点。第二种方法在这两个方面都失败了，但提出了一个有趣的问题，即我建议的方法如何扩展到其他领域。
Gabriele Badano offers three criticisms of my challenge to the orthodox family of theories of legitimacy in bioethics. First, I assumed an ‘oversimplified version of the orthodoxy’. Second, I failed to appreciate its domain of application. Third, I only addressed the ways in which orthodox theorists incorporate substance as an ‘afterthought’—and, even then, only by rehashing Gopal Sreenivasan’s argument. Here, I respond to each, taking up the first and third before ending with reflections on the second. The first underestimates the insight that criticism of the simplified version provides to that of the more complex relatives. The third misunderstands the relationship between my view and Sreenivasan’s and neglects an entire argument of my paper. The second fails in light of these two, but raises interesting questions about how the method I suggest might be extended to other domains.