Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs

Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs
复制标题

相论和韵律拼写:动词的情况

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Selkirk
E. Selkirk
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Kratzer;E. Selkirk

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文将探讨采用乔姆斯基最近的建议的后果,根据乔姆斯基的建议,句法推导过程中的阶段。阶段的概念-通过相关的拼写概念-允许一个有见地的理论的事实,即句法成分接受默认短语重音不是全面的,但作为一个功能的尚未被解释的条件对他们的句法环境。我们将看到,音系学的证据要求我们对关于哪些功能范畴实际上定义了一个阶段的理论作一些修正。默认的模式,语法确定,短语压力被认为是由于韵律拼写要求最高的短语在拼写域对应于一个主要的韵律短语在语音表示,并进行主要短语压力。
Abstract In this article we will explore the consequences of adopting recent proposals by Chomsky, according to which the syntactic derivation proceeds in terms of phases. The notion of phase – through the associated notion of spellout – allows for an insightful theory of the fact that syntactic constituents receive default phrase stress not across the board, but as a function of yet-to-be-explicated conditions on their syntactic context. We will see that the phonological evidence requires us to modify somewhat the theory of which functional categories actually define a phase. Patterns of default, syntax-determined, phrase stress are argued to result from prosodic spellout requiring the highest phrase in the spellout domain to correspond to a major prosodic phrase in phonological representation, and carry major phrase stress.