REEXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE FOR THE DSM-III PERSONALITY-DISORDER CLUSTERS
REEXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE FOR THE DSM-III PERSONALITY-DISORDER CLUSTERS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1521/pedi.1993.7.4.320
复制
发表时间：
1993-12-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
SCHULLER, DR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BAGBY, RM;JOFFE, RT;SCHULLER, DR
11种人格障碍在临床上被分为三类，或称为三个集群。近期因素分析研究的结果被解读为对三集群模型提供了实证支持。然而，这些研究通常仅对从单个样本中获取的一种测量方法进行因素分析，这削弱了结果的可靠性和普遍性。不同的研究还使用了不同的因素分析程序，这使得跨研究比较变得困难。没有一项研究针对假设的三集群模型对其结果进行正式检验。在本研究中，对从不同样本以及量表中得出的11种人格障碍的已发表相关矩阵进行了一套通用的因素分析程序。然后使用一致性系数将每个因素解与代表三集群模型的假设因素结构矩阵进行统计比较。所有五个样本都显示出与假设矩阵具有统计学意义的一致性，尽管在一些情况下个别量表并不十分相符。对于C集群来说尤其如此。
The 11 personality disorders are organized clinically into three categories, or clusters. Results from recent factor analytic studies have been interpreted as providing empirical support for the three cluster model. These studies, however, have typically subjected only one measure obtained from a single sample to factor analysis, weakening the reliability and generalizability of the results. Different studies have also used different factor analytic procedures, which renders comparison across studies difficult. None of the studies have formally tested their results against a hypothetical three cluster model. In this study, published correlational matrices of the 11 personality disorders generated from differing samples as well as scales were subjected to a common set of factor analytic procedures. Each factor solution was then compared statistically to a hypothetical factor structure matrix representing the three cluster model using congruence coefficients. All five samples revealed statistically significant congruence with the hypothetical matrix, although there were several instances where individual scales did not correspond well. This was especially so for Cluster C.