Validation of an algorithm to estimate gestational age in electronic health plan databases.
Validation of an algorithm to estimate gestational age in electronic health plan databases.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/pds.3407
复制
发表时间:
2013-05
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Toh, Sengwee
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li, Qian;Andrade, Susan E.;Cooper, William O.;Davis, Robert L.;Dublin, Sascha;Hammad, Tarek A.;Pawloski, Pamala A.;Pinheiro, Simone P.;Raebel, Marsha A.;Scott, Pamela E.;Smith, David H.;Dashevsky, Inna;Haffenreffer, Katherine;Johnson, Karin E.;Toh, Sengwee
关键词:
To validate an algorithm that uses delivery date and diagnosis codes to define gestational age at birth in electronic health plan databases. Using data from 225,384 live born deliveries among women aged 15–45 years in 2001–2007 within 8 of the 11 health plans participating in the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program, we compared 1) the algorithm-derived gestational age versus the “gold-standard” gestational age obtained from the infant birth certificate files; and 2) the prenatal exposure status of two antidepressants (fluoxetine and sertraline) and two antibiotics (amoxicillin and azithromycin) as determined by the algorithm-derived versus the gold-standard gestational age. The mean algorithm-derived gestational age at birth was lower than the mean obtained from the birth certificate files among singleton deliveries (267.9 versus 273.5 days) but not among multiple-gestation deliveries (253.9 versus 252.6 days). The algorithm-derived prenatal exposure to the antidepressants had a sensitivity and a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥95%, and a specificity and a negative predictive value (NPV) of almost 100%. Sensitivity and PPV were both ≥90%, and specificity and NPV were both >99% for the antibiotics. A gestational age algorithm based upon electronic health plan data correctly classified medication exposure status in most live born deliveries, but misclassification may be higher for drugs typically used for short durations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Andrade, Susan E.;McPhillips, Heather;Platt, Richard
通讯作者:
Platt, Richard
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Andrade, Susan E.;Raebel, Marsha A.;Gurwitz, Jerry H.
通讯作者:
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Raebel, MA;Ellis, JL;Andrade, SE
通讯作者:
Andrade, SE
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Bennett, Ian M.;Marcus, Steven C.;Coyne, James C.
通讯作者:
Coyne, James C.
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Andrade, Susan E.;Davis, Robert L.;Scott, Pamela E.
通讯作者:
Scott, Pamela E.