Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax
Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.008
复制
发表时间：
2015-03
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
C. Raux;Y. Croissant;Damien Pons
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Raux;Y. Croissant;Damien Pons
个人碳交易（PCT）的运输选择的应用最近被认为是在文献中作为减少CO2排放的一种手段。它在改变汽车出行行为的潜在有效性相比，传统的碳税（CT）通过一项声明的偏好调查进行法国司机（N = 300）。我们证明PCT可以有效地改变旅行行为，从而减少个人旅行的交通排放。然而，人们肯定不愿意减少汽车旅行。我们无法证明PCT和CT在改变旅行行为方面的有效性之间存在任何显著差异。然而，在实验中，PCT方案提供了一致的结果，而CT方案并非如此。需要进一步研究个人排放限额所传达的“社会规范”。
The application of personal carbon trading (PCT) to transport choices has recently been considered in the literature as a means of reducing CO2emissions. Its potential effectiveness in changing car travel behavior is compared to the conventional carbon tax (CT) by means of a stated preferences survey conducted among French drivers (N∼ 300). We show evidence that PCT could effectively change travel behavior and hence reduce transport emissions from personal travel. There is however a definite reluctance to reduce car travel. We were unable to demonstrate any significant difference between the effectiveness of PCT and the CT with regard to changing travel behavior. However, in the experiment, the PCT scheme provided consistent results while this was not the case for the CT scheme. Further research is needed into the “social norm” conveyed by a personal emissions allowance.