Systematic study of the iodinated rectal hydrogel spacer material discrepancy on accuracy of proton dosimetry.
Systematic study of the iodinated rectal hydrogel spacer material discrepancy on accuracy of proton dosimetry.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/acm2.13774
复制
发表时间:
2022-10
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Ding, Kai
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hooshangnejad, Hamed;Han, Dong;Feng, Ziwei;Dong, Liang;Sun, Edward;Du, Kaifang;Ding, Kai
关键词:
Iodination of rectal hydrogel spacer increases the computed tomography (CT) visibility. The effect of iodinated hydrogel spacer material on the accuracy of proton dosimetry has not been fully studied yet. We presented a systematic study to determine the effect of iodination on proton dosimetry accuracy during proton therapy (PT). PT plans were designed for 20 prostate cancer patients with rectal hydrogel spacer. Three variations of hydrogel density were considered. First, as the ground truth, the true elemental composition of hydrogel true material (TM), verified by our measurement of spacer stopping power ratio, was used for plan optimization and Monte Carlo dose calculation. The dose distribution was recalculated with (1) no material (NM) override based on the CT intensity of the iodinated spacer, and (2) the water material (WM) override, where spacer material was replaced by water. The plans were compared with the ground truth using the metrics of gamma index (GI) and dosimetric indices. The iodination of hydrogel spacer affected the proton dose distribution with the NM scenario showing the most deviation from the ground truth. The iodination of spacer resulted in a notable increase in CT intensity and led to the treatment planning systems mistreating the iodinated spacer as a high‐density material. Among the structures adjacent to the target, neurovascular bundles showed the largest dose difference, up to 350 cGy or about 5% of the prescribed dose with NM. Compared to the WM scenario, dose distribution similarity and GI passing ratios were lower in the NM scenario. The inaccurate CT intensity‐based material for iodinated spacer resulted in errors in PT dose calculation. We found that the error was negligible if the iodinated spacer was replaced with water. Water density can be used as a clinically accessible and convenient alternative material override to true spacer material.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.184
发表时间:
2018-11-01
期刊:
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
影响因子:
--
作者:
Feng Z;Rao AD;Cheng Z;Shin EJ;Moore J;Su L;Kim SH;Wong J;Narang A;Herman JM;McNutt T;Li D;Ding K
通讯作者:
Ding K
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Hooshangnejad, Hamed;Youssefian, Sina;Ding, Kai
通讯作者:
Ding, Kai
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Pan, Hubert Y.;Jiang, Jing;Smith, Benjamin D.
通讯作者:
Smith, Benjamin D.
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Kamran, Sophia C.;McClatchy, David M.;Efstathiou, Jason A.
通讯作者:
Efstathiou, Jason A.
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Conroy D;Becht K;Forsthoefel M;Pepin AN;Lei S;Rashid A;Collins BT;Lischalk JW;Suy S;Aghdam N;Hankins RA;Collins SP
通讯作者:
Collins SP