A Generalizability Analysis of the Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale for Chinese College Students
A Generalizability Analysis of the Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale for Chinese College Students
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00241
复制
发表时间：
2019-04-12
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Wang, Weijun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Li, Guangming;Xie, Jinyan;Wang, Weijun
大学生移动的手机成瘾与身心健康、学习成绩呈负相关。目前，许多自制的问卷正在中国大学生中进行，以评估移动的手机成瘾倾向。本研究运用单变量概化理论和多变量概化理论，对移动的成瘾倾向量表（MPATS）的心理测量学特征和内部结构进行了研究。数据来自中国西南地区的1，253名大学生。主要分析方法包括单变量随机测量模式px（i：h）和多变量随机测量模式（p）在点xi度上的概化设计。结果表明，被试的方差分量和与被试有关的方差分量能够解释量表的大部分变异，而项目的方差分量较小，量表的信度指数和概化系数分别为0.85和0.88。在多元概化分析中，参与者的方差分量和与参与者相关的方差分量占量表变异的大部分，项目的方差分量较小。戒断症状、显著性、社会舒适度和心境变化的概化系数为0.64-0.80，信度指数为0.63 ~ 0.77。而总体评分的概化系数和信度指数分别为0.91和0.90。此外，四个维度对总体得分方差的贡献率与初始量表的分配意图不同。最后，对提高各维度测验信度的建议进行了讨论。
College students' mobile phone addiction is negatively associated with physical and mental health and academic performance. Many self-made questionnaires are currently being administered to Chinese college students to evaluate the mobile phone addiction tendency. Using the univariate generalizability theory and multivariate generalizability theory, this study investigated the psychometric properties and the internal structure of the Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale (MPATS), the most widely used survey questionnaire assessing the status of Chinese college students' mobile addiction. Data were a sample of 1,253 college students from the southwest of China. Primary analytic approaches included the generalizability design of univariate random measurement mode p x (i:h) and multivariate random measurement mode (p) over dot x i degrees. Results showed that the variance component of the participants and the variation related to the participants explained most of the variation of the scale, while the variance component of the items was small, and the generalizability coefficient and dependability index of the scale were 0.88 and 0.85. In the multivariate generalizability analysis, the variance component of the participants and the variation related to the participants accounted for most of the variation of the scale and the variance component of the items was small. The generalizability coefficients of withdrawal symptoms, salience, social comfort, and mood changes were 0.64-0.80, and the dependability indexes were 0.63-0.77. However, the generalizability coefficient and reliability index of universe score were 0.91 and 0.90. In addition, the contribution ratio of the four dimensions to the universe score variance was different from the assignment intention of the initial scale. Recommendations were discussed on the improvement of the test reliability for each dimension.