Optimization Techniques for Chlorine Dosage Scheduling in Water Distribution Networks: A Comparative Analysis
Optimization Techniques for Chlorine Dosage Scheduling in Water Distribution Networks: A Comparative Analysis
复制标题
配水管网氯剂量调度优化技术:比较分析
DOI:
10.1061/9780784484852.091
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Abokifa, Ahmed A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Moeini, Mohammadreza;Sela, Lina;Taha, Ahmad F.;Abokifa, Ahmed A.
A sufficient dose of disinfectant needs to be applied to maintain a minimum residual throughout drinking water distribution systems (WDSs). Yet, excessive dosing of chlorine-based disinfectants leads to the formation of hazardous disinfection byproducts. Several frameworks have been proposed in previous literature to optimize chlorine dosing schedules by minimizing the total dose while maintaining evenly distributed residuals throughout the WDS. Many of these studies relied on evolutionary algorithms (EAs), such as the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). EAs are known to require numerous evaluations of computationally expensive water quality (WQ) models and typically feature many parameters that require careful tuning. Recently, Bayesian optimization (BO) has been proposed as an alternative to EAs for the optimization of water quality in WDSs. To speed up convergence, BO builds a probabilistic surrogate model (e.g., Gaussian process) in place of the original black-box model and then leverages the predictions to explicitly control the exploration/exploitation trade-off. Yet, it is still unclear how BO’s performance compares against EA’s for the optimization of WDSs. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by conducting a systematic comparison between the performance of BO, GA, and PSO for the optimization of chlorine dosage schedules. To that end, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis is conducted on each optimization approach to understand how different optimization parameters influence their performance. The results revealed that BO requires significantly fewer evaluations than GA and PSO to converge to high-quality solutions. On the other hand, GA displayed lower sensitivity to the change in the optimization parameters compared to BO and PSO.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Ostfeld;Elad Salomons
通讯作者:
Elad Salomons
DOI:
10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000473
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
M. T. Ayvaz;E. Kentel
通讯作者:
E. Kentel