Citizenship and identity: living in diasporas in post-war Europe?
Citizenship and identity: living in diasporas in post-war Europe?
复制标题
公民身份和身份：战后欧洲的侨民生活？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Y. Soysal
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Soysal
散居，作为一个受人尊敬的概念，在我们的政治和知识话语中占有重要地位。我的文章质疑在解释当代移民经验时将散居作为一个分析类别的部署。流散理论特别关注祖国和国外的种族轴心，忽视了国家的违法行为，忽视了成员的新动态和地形。我认为，通过将我们的分析普罗维登斯的注意力集中在公民身份的制定和颁布的激增场所上，可以实现一个更富有成效的视角。我通过阐述当代公民身份形成的两个悖论来做到这一点：a）权利和身份这两个公民身份的主要组成部分日益脱钩; B）公共领域中的特殊主义主张及其通过普遍主义人格话语的合法化趋势。这些矛盾保证了我们有新的形式提出主张、调动身份和行使公民权，这些形式超越了族裔知情的散居安排、交易和财产的有限自治领范围。
Diaspora, as a venerated concept, has a strong placement in our political and intellectual discourses. My article questions the deployment of diaspora as an analytical category in explaining the contemporary immigration experience. Focusing peculiarly on the ethnic axis of homelands and abroad, theories of diaspora overlook the transgressions of the national and lose sight of the new dynamics and topography of membership. I suggest that a more productive perspective is achieved by focusing our analytical providence on the proliferating sites of making and enacting citizenship. I do this by elaborating two paradoxes underlying the contemporary formations of citizenship: a) the increasing decoupling of rights and identities, the two main components of citizenship; b) the tendency towards particularistic claims in public spheres and their legitimation through universalistic discourses of personhood. These paradoxes warrant that we have new forms of making claims, mobilizing identity and practising citizenship, which lie beyond the limiting dominion of ethnically informed diasporic arrangements, transactions and belongings.